VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property's Poor Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal reduced the rent from £875 to £470 per month because the property was in poor condition and lacked modern facilities such as central heating and a wash hand basin.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction if the property is in poor condition and lacks modern facilities.

Topics

rent determinationproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the condition of the property and the terms of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent due to disrepair and lack of modern amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a reduced rent of £470 per month due to the property's poor condition and lack of modern amenities, rejecting the landlord's proposed rent of £875 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £470.00 Per Calendar Month (To exclude Water Rates and Council Tax but to include any amounts in paragraphs 3 and 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 February 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 October 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies. The tenant is required to keep the property in the condition at the commencement of the term, fair wear and tear excepted.

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.

8. Description of premises A late Victorian/early Edwardian three-storey semi-detached house of traditional brick construction, with rendered front elevation and pitched tiled roof, which has been converted into three flats. Flat 3 is on the second floor, accessed off the common parts, stairs and comprises, entrance lobby on half-landing, stairs up to next half-landing – WC, further stairs up to second floor - one reception room with kitchen off, one bedroom and bathroom.

[NAME] of Decision 22 April 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : [NAME] [COUNSEL] [COMPANY] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent - sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Application : 21 January 2025 Date of Decision :

22 April 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £470 (Four Hundred and Seventy Pounds) Per Calendar Month with effect from 1 February 2025.

HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618 2 FULL REASONS

Background 1. On 27 December 2024 the landlord served a notice under section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £875 per month in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 1 February 2025.

2. On 21 January 2025 under section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988, the tenant referred the landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal inspected the property on 1 April 2025, following its Directions. Whereas the tenant attended the inspection, neither did the landlord, nor the landlord’s representative. 4. [ADDRESS] (‘the building’) is a late Victorian/early Edwardian three-storey semi-detached house of traditional brick construction, with rendered front elevation and pitched tiled roof. It has been converted into three flats.

5. Flat 3 (‘the property’) is on the second floor, accessed off the common parts entrance hall and stairs. The property comprises, entrance lobby on a half- landing, stairs up to the next half-landing – a separate WC, further stairs up to the second floor – one reception room with kitchen off, one bedroom and a bathroom. Evidence

6. The Tribunal gave Directions dated 28 February 2025. The Tribunal directed the application to be suitable for determination on the papers, coupled with their inspection of the property.

7. The landlord’s Statement was to be sent by 13 March 2025; and the tenant’s Statement was to be sent by 26 March 2025.

8. The Tribunal has considered the Statement of [NAME] [NAME] [NAME], undated, but given on 13 March 2025 and copied to the tenant the same day. [NAME] [APPELLANT] says the landlord has provided electric heating and double glazing.

9. In addition, the Tribunal has received the tenant’s submissions which had been dispatched on 25 March 2025 (thereby in accordance with the Tribunal’s Directions). Whereas the Tribunal has been able to view the three photographs referred to there in, it has been unable to open/view the attachment (the Statement). Notwithstanding the Tribunal having informed the tenant accordingly, the tenant has not, at the time of giving its Decision, re-submitted her Statement (submissions).

10. Despite what the Tribunal says at paragraph 9 above, having carried out its inspection of [ADDRESS] and the property, coupled with applying

HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618 3 proportionality to the case, the Tribunal has concluded it can proceed to give its determination.

11. With respect to the property, the landlord’s Statement includes the accommodation in outline, described as a one-bedroom flat, but neither a floor plan nor any photographs. The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement dated 14 September 2021, with a commencement date of 1 October 2021. The property is let unfurnished.

12. Under both ‘Improvements’ and ‘Disrepairs/Defects: Age and Condition of Bathroom and Kitchen fittings’, [NAME] [NAME] says, ‘’Unknown.’’ 13. Under ‘Any Other Comments’, [NAME] [NAME] gives outline details of the property’s location in Bexhill-on-Sea, the local road network and its transport links.

14. To assist the Tribunal, [NAME] [NAME] has provided comparable lettings’ properties to which he has referred to reach his valuation of £875 per calendar month.

15. The three comparable lettings’ properties are all one-bedroom flats and are in the rental value range of £850 per calendar month to £995 per calendar month. Each is set out in a schedule with headings: Miles From Subject Property [sic], Size, Description, Other Amenities, Rent and Analysis.

16. Thereafter, [NAME] [NAME] has provided a ‘Rental Schedule’ given by [COMPANY] understood to be dated August 2024 for [ADDRESS]. The market rent in their schedule for Flat 3, the second floor flat, is £700 per calendar month. The Tribunal understands this to be an extract from a report on the property given by [COMPANY].

17. Following what the Tribunal says at paragraph 9 above, the three photographs provided by Ms [NAME] identify items of disrepair. The Law Section 14, Housing Act 1988 - Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First- tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618 4 (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.

18. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the tenancy. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

Determination and Valuation

HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618 5 19. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies. The tenant is required to keep the property in the condition at the commencement of the term, fair wear and tear excepted.

20. After reviewing the rental values of the comparable lettings’ properties given by the landlord, and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the market rent for the property in good tenantable condition is £925 (Nine Hundred and Twenty-Five Pounds) Per Calendar Month.

21. From the Tribunal’s inspection, the evidence given by the landlord’s Representative and the photographs provided by the tenant, which have been viewed by the Tribunal, the building in general, both internally and externally, and the property are in very poor condition, with various items of disrepair and outstanding works.

22. The Tribunal at its inspection noted instances of mould in the property and the ceiling in the bedroom is overlaid with a polystyrene material.

23. The property is on split levels, which is not ideal and there is no wash hand basin (‘w h b’) in the separate WC.

24. The Tribunal has identified Property Management issues at the building; typically, there is no Notice board in the common parts’ entrance hall to display the name of the [NAME] with their contact details and the building’s Fire Safety Certificate.

25.

Accordingly, the Tribunal has concluded adjustments are required to the market rent, which are summarised and set out in its valuation below.

26. The Tribunal’s valuation: Market rent in good condition (£ PCM)

£925 Less deductions (£ PCM) for: General wants of repair to the building and

£150 the property Split levels and no ‘w h b’ in the separate WC £25 No Central Heating £50 The Tenant’s provision of White Goods

£30 The Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains £25 The unmodernised bathroom/WC £75 The unmodernised kitchen £100 £455 Market rent (per calendar month) £470

27. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under

HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0618 6 the terms of this assured tenancy was £470 (Four Hundred and Seventy Pounds) Per Calendar Month.

28. The Tribunal’s determination of the rental value of the property is a reduction in rent down from £550 Per Calendar Month to £470 Per Calendar Month. The Tribunal has determined that the property is currently over-rented.

29. The Tribunal has received no representations from the tenant that the starting date for the new rent specified in the landlord’s notice would cause her undue hardship.

30.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directs that the new rent of £470 Per Calendar Month should take effect from 1 February 2025. This being the date specified in the landlord’s Notice proposing a new rent.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 days’ time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 days’ time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property is in poor condition.
  • The property lacks modern facilities.
  • The property is in disrepair.
  • The property's fixtures are old.
  • Comparable evidence shows lower rents for similar conditions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent was reduced from £875 to £470 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's poor condition and lack of modern amenities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the property was in poor condition and lacked modern amenities was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to a rent reduction if the property is in poor condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs showing disrepair and the landlord's statement were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.