First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new market rent of £775 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable properties and the current state of the rented property. The decision reflects adjustments based on heating, insulation, and disrepair issues.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of the market rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, considering the property's condition and improvements.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering the property's condition and improvements. However, applications cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local rental values, adjusting for property condition. The tenant argued that the proposed rent increase was too high.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were: 49 [NAME] Sussex [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £775.00 Per Calendar Month (To exclude Water Rates and Council Tax but to include any amounts in paragraphs 3 & 4)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 December 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 10 September 2007
5. Length of the term or rental period Six Months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies. The tenant is required to keep the interior of the premises in as good and tenantable state of repair and decorative order as at the beginning of the term.
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.
8. Description of premises A two-storey terrace purpose-built (believed to be 1980’s) block of flats with brick faced elevations under a pitched and tiled roof. The premises is a first floor flat with its own ground floor entrance and accommodation comprising: ground floor – entrance lobby with stairs up to first floor – reception room with kitchen area, one bedroom and one bathroom/WC. There is unallocated off-street parking.
[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 12 January 2026
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 Property : 49 [NAME], Haywards Heath, West Sussex, [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [NAME] [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent - sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Application : 20 November 2025 Date of Decision :
12 January 2026
HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 2 DECISION
On 12 January 2026 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £775 (Seven Hundred and Seventy-Five Pounds) per Calendar Month to take effect from 10 December 2025.
Background 1. By way of an application given to the Tribunal dated 20 November 2025 (albeit received 21 November 2025), the Applicant (‘’the tenant’’) of 49 [NAME], Haywards Heath, West Sussex, [POSTCODE] (hereinafter referred to as ‘’the property’’) referred a Notice of Increase in Rent (‘’the Notice’’) by the Respondent (‘’the landlord’’) of the property under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (‘’the Act’’) to the Tribunal.
2. The Notice, dated 7 November 2025, proposed a new rent of £950 per calendar month in lieu of a passing rent of £645 per calendar month, to take effect from 10 December 2025.
3. Ms [NAME] tenancy agreement is dated 10 September 2007 and is for a term of six months from 10 September 2007 at a rent of £550 per calendar month.
4. The Tribunal issued Directions dated 4 December 2025 advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on the papers unless either party objected, in writing, within seven days. The parties were also advised that, whereas no inspection would be undertaken, the Tribunal would seek to view the property on the internet. (Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Directions respectively.)
5. The [NAME] includes for provision of photographs to assist the Tribunal to understand the case and to help the party to present the issues.
6. The Directions required the landlord and the tenant to submit their completed Rent Appeal Statements (‘’[NAME]’’) to the Tribunal by 19 December 2025 and 5 January 2026 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party. Whereas Ms [NAME] has submitted a [NAME] in accordance with the Directions, the landlord has not submitted a [NAME].
7. Ms [RESPONDENT] [NAME] includes a selection of photographs of the property to assist in presenting her case.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 12 January 2026 based on Ms [NAME] application under section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988 and her [NAME] and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area.
9. The Tribunal has read the papers and Ms [NAME] submissions in full. In this decision the Tribunal does not discuss each point given but limits it to those relevant to the determination of the market rent in accordance with the legislation.
HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 3 The Property 10. From the information provided in the papers and [ADDRESS], 49 [NAME] forms part of a terrace of two-storey purpose-built flats believed to have been built in the 1980’s with brick faced elevations under a pitched and tiled roof. No. 49 is a first floor flat with its own off-street entrance.
11. The accommodation comprises, ground floor – entrance lobby with stairs up to the first floor – reception room with kitchen area, one bedroom and one bathroom/WC. There is off-street parking. 12. [NAME] runs in a northerly direction off [ADDRESS] and in part is a cul- de-sac. [ADDRESS] is in between [ADDRESS] and the junction of [ADDRESS] with [ADDRESS]. It is the southerly part of Haywards Heath. The Tenancy Agreement
13. The tenancy agreement is dated 10 September 2007 and is for a term of six months from 10 September 2007 at a rent of £550 per calendar month, payable monthly in advance.
14. At the expiration of the fixed term, the tenancy has continued as a contractual periodic tenancy in accordance with the Housing Act 1988 (as amended). The tenant is required to give at least two calendar months’ notice to terminate the tenancy.
15. The tenant covenants, inter alia, to pay the rent, to pay Council Tax, to keep the interior of the Premises clean and tidy and in as good and tenantable state of repair and decorative order as at the beginning of the Term (clause 4.6).
16. The landlord covenants, in effect, for quiet enjoyment only.
17. Whereas the tenancy agreement, in effect, provides for its continuation as a periodic tenancy, there is no rent review clause. Submissions 18. Ms [NAME] [NAME] was submitted on 5 January 2026 and was copied to the landlord the same day.
19. Ms [RESPONDENT] describes the property as terraced, first floor - one reception room with kitchen area, one bedroom and one bathroom/WC. Within her [NAME] Ms [NAME] has included a selection of photographs which the Tribunal understands were taken contemporaneously with the application.
20. Under ‘Features’, Ms [NAME] says Double Glazing and Carpets (not Curtains) have been provided by the landlord. Ms [RESPONDENT] goes on to say there is off-street parking.
21. Under ‘Improvements’ Ms [NAME] lists the following: double glazing installed in 2010, the immersion water tank was replaced in June 2016, and a new fuse board was installed in November 2025. The Tribunal determines whereas the installation of double glazing constitutes works of improvement, the replacement
HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 4 of the water tank and the installation of a new fuse board are works otherwise required to be carried out by the landlord as a part of the day-to-day maintenance and upkeep of the property.
22. Under ‘Condition of the property…Disrepairs/Defects…’, Ms [NAME] has itemised various matters with references to photographs attached to show the same, which the Tribunal outlines as follows: (1) the property was built in the 1980’s and all of the kitchen and bathroom fixtures and fittings are original, (2) the kitchen cabinets are worn and old, (3) no white goods are included in the rental, (4) the wash hand basin is cracked, as is the bath panel, (4) the bath taps drip, (5) the replacement bathroom heater is second hand, (6) the heating is original and comprises a night storage heater in the reception room and one convection panel heater in the bedroom, (7) the carpets were fitted in circa 2005 and are worn and discoloured, but functional, (8) the front door is original, having not been replaced when the windows were double glazed, it is very drafty and there is a significant gap between the wall and the door frame, and (9) sockets and light switches were noted by the [NAME] in November 2025 to be replaced due to cracks and failed fittings.
23. Under ‘Any Other Comments’, Ms [NAME] says the train station is 1.1 miles away, an approximate 20-minute walk.
24. Under ‘Your assessment of the rental value of the property’, Ms [NAME] says ‘’There are a number of properties similar to this one and the rents are all below £900.’’ Ms [NAME] adds properties closer to the railway station command slightly higher rents.
25. Ms [NAME] concludes to attach three (there are four) listings to show similar properties to the subject property, although three of these appear to relate to historic previous listings in 2023 and 2024. The only recent listing (added 24 November 2025) is a ground floor one-bedroom flat on [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS]16, unfurnished, quoting £895 per calendar month ‘let agreed’. The Law Section 14, Housing Act 1988 - Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First- tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of
HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 5 Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
26. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a [NAME], under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the tenancy. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 6 Considerations and Valuation 27. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to determine this case reasonably and fairly based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers the Tribunal decided it could do so.
28. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the tenant(s) are not relevant to the issue.
29. Whereas Ms [APPELLANT] has given a [NAME], the landlord, Mr [RESPONDENT] has not given a [NAME]. Ms [RESPONDENT] [NAME] includes a selection of photographs to assist to present her case. In addition, the Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement.
30. Having considered the comparable evidence provided and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £950 (Nine Hundred and Fifty Pounds) per Calendar Month.
31. From its analysis of the papers to include Ms [NAME] submissions, the Tribunal has determined adjustments are required to its determination of the market rent of the property, as follows. • There is no central heating. Heating is by way of a night storage heater and a convection panel heater. • Whereas double glazing has been installed to the windows, the front door is original and provides poor thermal insulation. • There are no curtains and the carpets are worn and discoloured, but functional. • There are no White Goods. • The tenant, in effect, covenants for the internal decorations. • Both the kitchen units and bathroom equipment are dated. • There are items of disrepair.
32. Following the above, the Tribunal’s valuation is shown below: Market rent for the property (£ PCM) - £950 With adjustments (£ PCM) for: Partial heating £20 Poor thermal insulation to the front door £20 No provision of curtains and the carpets are dated £20 No provision of White Goods £30
HAV/45UG/MNR/2025/0822 7 Tenant’s internal decorations requirement £10 Dated kitchen units and bathroom equipment £50 Items of disrepair £25 £175 Market rent (per calendar month) £775 33. Ms [NAME] has not given any submission to the Tribunal that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Notice would cause her undue hardship.
34.
Accordingly, the Tribunal directs that the new rent of £775 per Calendar Month should take effect from 10 December 2025. This being the date specified in the Notice proposing a new rent.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 days’ time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 days’ time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,995 per Month for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair market rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Semi-Detached House in Buckfastleigh
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced Due to Property Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £2,450 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should be set at a fair market rate considering the property's condition and amenities.
- A tenant is entitled to have the First-tier Tribunal determine the fair market rent of their property when a landlord proposes an increase.
- A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the property's condition and the landlord's obligations under the assured tenancy.
- A tenant may have their rent reduced if the property is not in good order.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A landlord may increase the rent of an assured periodic tenancy if it reflects a fair market value, adjusted for property condition and amenities provided.
- A tenant is entitled to have a First-tier Tribunal determine the market rent of their property under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, but the case was dismissed.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £775 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the rental value of a property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal decided based on comparable evidence and local rental values, adjusting for heating, insulation, and disrepair issues.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant argued that the proposed rent increase was too high based on comparable properties and property condition.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can challenge it through the First-tier Tribunal if they believe it is too high based on comparable properties and property condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property, tenancy agreement, and comparable rental listings were important in making the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
