VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Reduced Due to Property Issues

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent due to property issues affecting the tenant's living conditions, adjusting the rent to £875 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant may have their rent reduced if the property is not in good order.

Topics

rent determinationproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to property issues.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent due to property issues affecting the tenant's living conditions, adjusting the rent to £875 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774 Property : 15 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] :

[COUNSEL] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None, determined on the papers

Date of Decision

:

15th December 2025

DECISION

CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774 2

Summary of Decision

1. On 15th December 2025 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £875 per month to take effect from 14th December 2025. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 16th October 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £925 per month, in place of the existing rent of £850 per month, to take effect from 14th December 2025. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 17th October 2025 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued Directions on 20th October 2025 which, following a request from the Tenant to extend the deadline by 2 days, were amended on 27th November 2025 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. The Tenant submitted papers which had been copied to the Landlord. No submission was made by the Landlord.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 15th December 2025.

9. These reasons address the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law

S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774 3 (1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes

CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774 4 any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a ground floor flat within a purpose built 2-storey block of similar properties situated about 5 miles south of the centre of Aylesbury.

11. The accommodation includes a hall, living room, kitchen, bedroom and bathroom with WC. Outside there is off-street permit parking.

12. Windows are double glazed and heating is from electric convector heaters. The Energy Performance Rating is ‘D’.

13. Carpets, curtains and white goods are all provided by the Landlord. Submissions 14. The initial tenancy began on 214th July 2023 at a rent of £850 per month.

15. The Tenant states that the heating is from two electrical heaters one of which does not work properly. He states that the double glazing has large gaps and the front door appears to be the wrong size and is incorrectly fitted.

16. The Tenant states that the hot water is not time controlled and there is a dehumidifier which was present when he moved in.

17. The Tenant also states that the hall carpet is poorly fitted 18. The Tenant states that he has repaired a 0.5cm gap in the front door, fitted a weather strip and repaired the front door lock.

19. The Tenant states that the property is affected by damp related issues including mould and extreme humidity despite responsible ventilation and drying practices. He provided a technical report which, on May 9th [year not provided] registered humidity levels of 83% in the bedroom and 67-72% across 5 rooms. The Tenant suggests that he has had respiratory issues over the past 5 months but cannot definitively link it to mould within the property.

20. The Tenant provided a timeline of damp issues which were not apparent when he moved in and seemed to reduce in the summer months. The Landlord arranged for [NAME] to attend the property who then sprayed affected areas and issued a technical report. The Tenant provided photographs of mould and has later reported these issues to the local Environmental Health authority.

21. Neither party provided evidence of market rents achieved for similar properties elsewhere in the area.

CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774 5

Consideration and Valuation

22. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

23. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

24. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Aylesbury, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £975 per month.

25. Such an open market letting would be for a tenantable property in good order with the Landlord responsible for internal decoration and on the basis that carpets, curtains and white goods would all be provided by the Landlord.

26. However, this property is not in such good order to command this full rent, and an adjustment is necessary to reflect the issues with high humidity leading to condensation and black mould.

27. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that a monthly reduction of £75 should be made to reflect the mould issues and a further £25 per month to reflect the damaged electric heater.

28. The Tribunal noted that the Tenant had carried out some minor repairs but did not consider these to be improvements worthy of any adjustment to the rent.

29. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 30. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £875 per month.

31. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £875 per month should take effect from 14th December 2025, this being the date specified in the notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where

CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774 6 possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/00MX/MNR/2025/0774

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 15 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS] Buckinghamshire [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 875 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 14th December 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 14th July 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises Ground floor 1-bedroom flat

[NAME] of Decision 15th December 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's high humidity and black mould issues justified a rent reduction.
  • A monthly reduction of £75 was applied due to the mould issues.
  • A further £25 per month reduction was made because of a damaged electric heater.
  • The Tribunal determined the market rent based on written submissions without an oral hearing.
  • The new rent of £875 per month was set to take effect from December 14, 2025, as specified in the landlord's notice.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord did not submit any evidence or representations to the Tribunal.
  • The tenant did not claim that the new rent's start date would cause undue hardship.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent due to property issues affecting the tenant's living conditions.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to reduce the rent because the property was not in good condition, affecting the tenant's living conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property, particularly the issues with high humidity leading to condensation and black mold.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to have their rent reduced if they can prove that the property is not in good condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of mold and a technical report on humidity levels were important evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person wishing to appeal this decision can apply to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) for permission to appeal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.