VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Rejects Appeal for Rent Increase During Fixed Term

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) rejected a tenant's appeal to challenge a rent increase during the fixed term of their lease. The tribunal ruled it had no authority to intervene under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant cannot seek a tribunal's intervention for rent increases during the fixed term of their tenancy agreement.

Topics

rent increasefixed-term tenancytribunal jurisdiction

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It outlines the process for landlords to propose rent increases through a notice in a prescribed form. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy, which begins at least two months after the notice is served.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to hear applications regarding rent increases during the fixed term of a tenancy agreement.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) dismissed an appeal concerning a rent increase during the fixed term of a tenancy agreement, citing lack of jurisdiction under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0062 HMCTS Code (paper, video, audio) :

P: PAPERREMOTE

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 13 July 2022 at 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Date of Decision : 13 July 2022

DECISION The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine this application for the reasons stated below.

Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because one was not requested and all the issues could be dealt with on

paper. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are the application and subsequent correspondence with 34 documents in an unstructured bundle, the contents of which have been noted.

REASONS

The Application 1. The Tribunal received an application from the Tenant, [APPELLANT] dated 25 March 2022. The application was received by the Tribunal on 30 March 2022.

2. The application referred a Landlord’s Notice of Increase that was in relation to [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (the subject property). The Notice of Increase was dated 21/2/2022 and proposed to increase the rent of the subject property from £1200.62 per month to £1297.90 per month with effect from 1 April 2022. The Law

3. The tribunal gains its jurisdiction to deal with rent increases of assured periodic tenancies (eg week to week or month to month) from section 13(1) of the Housing Act 1988. The section does not apply to fixed term tenancies. The section is set out below. Facts Found 4. The subject property was let to the tenants for a fixed term of three years commencing on 29 November 2019 and ending on 29 November 2022. The tenancy agreement contains provisions allowing for a rent increase on 1 April each year. Discussion and Reasons for the Decision 5. The tenancy is a fixed term tenancy and not a periodic tenancy and is still within the fixed term. Therefore, under the provisions of the Housing Act 1988 the tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the application.

Name: [NAME]: 13 July 2022

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.

The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.

If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Housing Act 1988

Assured Tenancies Rent and other terms 13 Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies.

(1)This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and

(b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A tenant cannot seek a tribunal's intervention for rent increases during the fixed term of their tenancy agreement.
  • The tribunal does not have jurisdiction over three-year fixed-term tenancies under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal decided it lacked the authority to hear the tenant's appeal for a rent increase during the fixed term of their tenancy agreement.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case because the tenancy was still within its fixed term.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 13, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenancy was still within its fixed term.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation would not be able to use the tribunal to challenge a rent increase during the fixed term of their tenancy agreement.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and the notice of rent increase were important documents.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.