Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Appeal for Rent Increase Determination
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed a tenant's application for rent increase determination, citing a lack of jurisdiction under the Housing Act 1988 for fixed-term tenancies. The decision was made remotely via paper submission.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is not entitled to a rent increase determination by the Tribunal during a fixed-term tenancy.
📖 What the law says
This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It outlines the process for landlords to propose rent increases through a notice in a prescribed form, specifying when the new rent would take effect.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over rent increases during a fixed-term tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal rejected an application for rent increase determination, stating it lacked jurisdiction under the Housing Act 1988 for fixed-term tenancies. The case was heard remotely on paper due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0061 HMCTS Code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] and [APPELLANT] [APPELLANT] Landlord : [NAME] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Date and venue of Consideration : 13 July 2022 at 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Date of Decision : 13 July 2022
DECISION The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine this application for the reasons stated below.
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because one was not requested and all the issues could be dealt with on
paper. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are the application and subsequent correspondence with 34 documents in an unstructured bundle, the contents of which have been noted.
REASONS
The Application 1. The Tribunal received an application from the Tenants, [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME] dated 31 March 2022. The application was received by the Tribunal on 31 March 2022.
2. The application referred a Landlord’s Notice of Increase that was in relation to [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (the subject property). The Notice of Increase was dated 21/2/2022 and proposed to increase the rent of the subject property from £1666.00 per month to £1800.99 per month with effect from 1 April 2022. The Law
3. The tribunal gains its jurisdiction to deal with rent increases of assured periodic tenancies (eg week to week or month to month) from section 13(1) of the Housing Act 1988. The section does not apply to fixed term tenancies. Facts Found 4. The subject property was let to the tenants for a fixed term of three years commencing on 2 January 2021 and ending on 2 January 2024. The tenancy agreement contains provisions allowing for a rent increase on 1 April each year. Discussion and Reasons for the Decision 5. The tenancy is a fixed term tenancy and not a periodic tenancy and is still within the fixed term. Therefore under the provisions of the Housing Act 1988 the tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the application.
Name: [NAME]: 13 July 2022
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.
The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Housing Act 1988
Assured Tenancies Rent and other terms 13 Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies.
(1)This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and
(b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Invalid Rent Increase Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Urgent Roof Repairs Dispensation Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freeholder Granted Permission to Remove Asbestos Without Tenant Consultatio…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Statutory Lease Extension
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Management Company Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Repai…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal lacked the authority to decide the application because the tenancy was for a fixed term.
- The property was rented for a fixed term of three years, from January 2, 2021, to January 2, 2024.
- The law governing rent increases for assured periodic tenancies does not apply to fixed-term tenancies.
- The tenancy was still within its fixed term, meaning the Tribunal had no jurisdiction under the Housing Act 1988.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided it had no jurisdiction to determine the rent increase application.
Who was involved?
The tenant applied for a rent increase determination, while the landlord provided the notice of increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided it lacked jurisdiction because the tenancy was a fixed-term tenancy, not a periodic one.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 13, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the tenancy was a fixed-term tenancy, not a periodic one, was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation would likely face the same outcome if their tenancy is also a fixed-term one.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The tenancy agreement and the landlord's notice of increase were key documents.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but only if permission is granted by the First-tier Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
