First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Service Charge Challenge
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the tenant's application to determine the reasonableness of service charges for the years 2019-2021. The dismissal was due to insufficient evidence provided by the tenant, including failure to prove their status as a tenant under the lease.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant must provide sufficient evidence to prove the unreasonableness of service charges.
📖 What the law says
A 'service charge' refers to an amount paid by a tenant as part of or in addition to rent, which covers services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance, or the landlord's management costs. The 'relevant costs' include the actual or estimated costs incurred by the landlord related to these services.
Service charges must be reasonable based on the relevant costs incurred. These costs should be considered reasonable if they cover services or works of a reasonable standard and are incurred reasonably. If the costs are incurred before the service charge is due, the charge must be reasonable, and adjustments can be made later.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant's application for a determination of the reasonableness of service charges was dismissed due to lack of evidence.
📜 Headnote Official document
The claimant sought a determination of the reasonableness of service charges for the years 2019-2021 under s27A and s20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The application was dismissed as the claimant failed to provide adequate evidence proving their status as a tenant and the reasonableness of the service charges.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AG/LSC/2021/0281 V:CVPREMOTE Property : Flat 2, 11 St John’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] of [NAME] Respondents : [redacted] : Did not appear and were not represented Type of Application : s27A and s20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Tribunal Members : Judge F J Silverman MA [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 07 February 2022 Date of Decision : 08 February 2022
2
DECISION AND ORDER
The Applicant’s application is dismissed.
This has been a remote video hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V:CVPREMOTE . A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. The document which the Tribunal was referred to are contained in an electronic bundle comprising 66 pages the contents of which are referred to below. The order made in these proceedings is described above.
REASONS
1 On 30 July 2021 the Applicant issued an application under s27A Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 seeking a determination of the reasonableness of service charges for the years 2019-2021. He also requested orders under s20C of the 1985 Act and Schedule 11 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
2 Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 02 September 2021. 3 The Tribunal received and read 66 pages of electronic documentation, including an incomplete witness statement made by the Applicant’s wife, which are referred to below. All the documentation supplied to the Tribunal had been submitted by or on behalf of the Applicant. 4 The hearing took place by way of a remote video (CVP) link to which the parties had previously consented. 5 The Applicant, represented by Mr [APPELLANT] of [NAME], was not present in person at the hearing. The Tribunal was told by his representative that he was abroad. The Respondents did not appear and were not represented. [RESPONDENT] , the Respondent’s managing agents, had attempted to contact the Respondent without success and the Tribunal had not received any reply at all to its emails to the Respondent who had failed to file any reply to the application and had also failed to comply with the Tribunal’s Directions. Mr [RESPONDENT] told the Tribunal that he understood that the Respondent had gone into liquidation but was unable to provide further details. 6 In accordance with current Practice Directions relating to Covid 19 the proceedings were recorded and the Tribunal did not make a physical inspection of the property but were able to obtain an overview of its exterior and location via GPS software. 7 The Applicant had not filed a statement of case or witness statement. His disputed service charge schedule (pages 48-50) merely says that he
3 disputes the estimated charges but, save for two cases where he states that services were not provided at all, does not provide any details or evidence to support his generic allegation of the unreasonableness of the estimated sums. A partial and patently incomplete witness statement made by the Applicant’s wife does not assist and the [NAME] was not present at the hearing. 8 The only lease included in the bundle of documents (page 15) was dated 12 April 2019 and had been made between [APPELLANT] as landlord and [APPELLANT] as tenant. This lease, for a term of 280 years, did not name the Applicant and appeared to be a building lease granted by the freeholder to a [NAME]. The Tribunal asked Mr [APPELLANT] to provide evidence that the Applicant was a tenant holding a term under a lease of the property. He was unable to do that. 9 Mr [NAME] offered to send a copy of the correct lease to the Tribunal who declined this offer on the basis that the time limits for disclosure and filing the bundle had expired and it would not be reasonable to proceed to make a decision which relied on a document which had not been formally disclosed to the Respondent. The Tribunal considered that an adjournment to allow service of the lease would not assist because, despite being in receipt of legal advice, the Applicant had not filed a statement of case or any supporting evidence as required by the Tribunal’s directions. 10 Without proof that the Applicant was/is the tenant, and with no evidence either of the landlord’s responsibilities or of the tenant’s liabilities under the lease or of the reasons for the Applicant’s dissatisfaction, the Tribunal is unable to make any determination under this application which is accordingly dismissed. 11 No order is made under s20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 or Schedule 11 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
12 The Law Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) Section 18 (1) In the following provisions of this Act "service charge" means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent - (a) which is payable, directly or indirectly, for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements or insurance or the landlord's costs of management, and (b) the whole or part of which varies or may vary according to the relevant costs. (2) The relevant costs are the costs or estimated costs incurred or to be incurred by or on behalf of the landlord, or a superior landlord, in connection with the matters for which the service charge is payable. (3) For this purpose -
4 (a) "costs" includes overheads, and (b) costs are relevant costs in relation to a service charge whether they are incurred, or to be incurred, in the period for which the service charge is payable or in an earlier or later period. Section 19 (1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the amount of a service charge payable for a period - (a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred, and (b) where they are incurred on the provisions of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard; and the amount payable shall be limited accordingly. (2) Where a service charge is payable before the relevant costs are incurred, no greater amount than is reasonable is so payable, and after the relevant costs have been incurred any necessary adjustment shall be made by repayment, reduction or subsequent charges or otherwise. Section 27A (1) An application may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether a service charge is payable and, if it is, as to - (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) An application may also be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether, if costs were incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance or management of any specified description, a service charge would be payable for the costs and, if it would, as to - (a) the person by whom it would be payable, (b) the person to whom it would be payable, (c) the amount which would be payable, (d) the date at or by which it would be payable, and (e) the manner in which it would be payable. (4) No application under subsection (1) or (3) may be made in respect of a matter which - (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant,
5 (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. Section 20 (1) Where this section applies to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the relevant contributions of tenants are limited in accordance with subsection (6) or (7) (or both) unless the consultation requirements have been either— (a) complied with in relation to the works or agreement, or (b) dispensed with in relation to the works or agreement by (or on appeal from) the appropriate tribunal . (2) In this section “relevant contribution”, in relation to a tenant and any works or agreement, is the amount which he may be required under the terms of his lease to contribute (by the payment of service charges) to relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement. (3) This section applies to qualifying works if relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works exceed an appropriate amount. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that this section applies to a qualifying long term agreement— (a) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement exceed an appropriate amount, or (b) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement during a period prescribed by the regulations exceed an appropriate amount. (5) An appropriate amount is an amount set by regulations made by the Secretary of State; and the regulations may make provision for either or both of the following to be an appropriate amount— (a) an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations, and (b) an amount which results in the relevant contribution of any one or more tenants being an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations. (6) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (5), the amount of the relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement which may be taken
6 into account in determining the relevant contributions of tenants is limited to the appropriate amount. (7) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (b) of that subsection, the amount of the relevant contribution of the tenant, or each of the tenants, whose relevant contribution would otherwise exceed the amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations is limited to the amount so prescribed or determined.] Section 20B (1) If any of the relevant costs taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge were incurred more than 18 months before a demand for payment of the service charge is served on the tenant, then (subject to subsection (2)), the tenant shall not be liable to pay so much of the service charge as reflects the costs so incurred. (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply if, within the period of 18 months beginning with the date when the relevant costs in question were incurred, the tenant was notified in writing that those costs had been incurred and that he would subsequently be required under the terms of his lease to contribute to them by the payment of a service charge. Section 20C (1) A tenant may make an application for an order that all or any of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings before a court, residential property tribunal or the Upper Tribunal, or in connection with arbitration proceedings, are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant or any other person or persons specified in the application. (2) The application shall be made— (a) in the case of court proceedings, to the court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the application is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court; (aa) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to that tribunal; (b) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to the tribunal before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the application is made after the proceedings are concluded, to any residential property tribunal; (c) in the case of proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, to the tribunal;
7 (d) in the case of arbitration proceedings, to the arbitral tribunal or, if the application is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court. (3) The court or tribunal to which the application is made may make such order on the application as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances. Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11, paragraph 1 (1) In this Part of this Schedule “administration charge” means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent which is payable, directly or indirectly— (a) for or in connection with the grant of approvals under his lease, or applications for such approvals, (b) for or in connection with the provision of information or documents by or on behalf of the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, (c) in respect of a failure by the tenant to make a payment by the due date to the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (d) in connection with a breach (or alleged breach) of a covenant or condition in his lease. (2) But an amount payable by the tenant of a dwelling the rent of which is registered under Part 4 of the Rent Act 1977 (c. 42) is not an administration charge, unless the amount registered is entered as a variable amount in pursuance of section 71(4) of that Act. (3) In this Part of this Schedule “variable administration charge” means an administration charge payable by a tenant which is neither— (a) specified in his lease, nor (b) calculated in accordance with a formula specified in his lease. (4) An order amending sub-paragraph (1) may be made by the appropriate national authority. Schedule 11, paragraph 2 A variable administration charge is payable only to the extent that the amount of the charge is reasonable. Schedule 11, paragraph 5 (1) An application may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether an administration charge is payable and, if it is, as to—
8 (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) The jurisdiction conferred on the appropriate tribunal in respect of any matter by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is in addition to any jurisdiction of a court in respect of the matter. (4) No application under sub-paragraph (1) may be made in respect of a matter which— (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. (6) An agreement by the tenant of a dwelling (other than a post-dispute arbitration agreement) is void in so far as it purports to provide for a determination— (a) in a particular manner, or (b) on particular evidence, of any question which may be the subject matter of an application under sub-paragraph (1).
Section 47 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
(1)Where any written demand is given to a tenant of premises to which this Part applies, the demand must contain the following information, namely—
(a)the name and address of the landlord, and
(b)if that address is not in England and Wales, an address in England and Wales at which notices (including notices in proceedings) may be served on the landlord by the tenant.
(2)Where—
(a)a tenant of any such premises is given such a demand, but
9
(b)it does not contain any information required to be contained in it by virtue of subsection (1),
then (subject to subsection (3)) any part of the amount demanded which consists of a service charge [F1or an administration charge] (“the relevant amount”) shall be treated for all purposes as not being due from the tenant to the landlord at any time before that information is furnished by the landlord by notice given to the tenant.
(3)The relevant amount shall not be so treated in relation to any time when, by virtue of an order of any court [F2or tribunal], there is in force an appointment of a [NAME] or manager whose functions include the receiving of service charges [F3or (as the case may be) administration charges] from the tenant.
(4)In this section “demand” means a demand for rent or other sums payable to the landlord under the terms of the tenancy.
Withholding of service charges Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s21 21 (1)A tenant may withhold payment of a service charge if— (a)the landlord has not provided him with information or a report— (i)at the time at which, or (ii)(as the case may be) by the time by which, he is required to provide it by virtue of section 21, or (b)the form or content of information or a report which the landlord has provided him with by virtue of that section (at any time) does not conform exactly or substantially with the requirements prescribed by regulations under that section. (2)The maximum amount which the tenant may withhold is an amount equal to the aggregate of— (a)the service charges paid by him in the period to which the information or report concerned would or does relate, and (b)amounts standing to the tenant's credit in relation to the service charges at the beginning of that period. (3)An amount may not be withheld under this section— (a)in a case within paragraph (a) of subsection (1), after the information or report concerned has been provided to the tenant by the landlord, or
10 (b)in a case within paragraph (b) of that subsection, after information or a report conforming exactly or substantially with requirements prescribed by regulations under section 21 has been provided to the tenant by the landlord by way of replacement of that previously provided. (4)If, on an application made by the landlord to the appropriate tribunal, the tribunal determines that the landlord has a reasonable excuse for a failure giving rise to the right of a tenant to withhold an amount under this section, the tenant may not withhold the amount after the determination is made. (5)Where a tenant withholds a service charge under this section, any provisions of the tenancy relating to non-payment or late payment of service charges do not have effect in relation to the period for which he so withholds it.
21B Notice to accompany demands for service charges (1)A demand for the payment of a service charge must be accompanied by a summary of the rights and obligations of tenants of dwellings in relation to service charges. (2)The Secretary of State may make regulations prescribing requirements as to the form and content of such summaries of rights and obligations. (3)A tenant may withhold payment of a service charge which has been demanded from him if subsection (1) is not complied with in relation to the demand. (4)Where a tenant withholds a service charge under this section, any provisions of the lease relating to non-payment or late payment of service charges do not have effect in relation to the period for which he so withholds it. (5)Regulations under subsection (2) may make different provision for different purposes. (6)Regulations under subsection (2) shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. S22 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
22 Request to inspect supporting accounts &c.
11 (1)This section applies where a tenant, or the secretary of a recognised tenants’ association, has obtained such a summary as is referred to in section 21(1) (summary of relevant costs), whether in pursuance of that section or otherwise. (2)The tenant, or the secretary with the consent of the tenant, may within six months of obtaining the summary require the landlord in writing to afford him reasonable facilities— (a)for inspecting the accounts, receipts and other documents supporting the summary, and (b)for taking copies or extracts from them. (3)A request under this section is duly served on the landlord if it is served on— (a)an agent of the landlord named as such in the rent book or similar document, or (b)the person who receives the rent of behalf of the landlord; and a person on whom a request is so served shall forward it as soon as may be to the landlord. (4)The landlord shall make such facilities available to the tenant or secretary for a period of two months beginning not later than one month after the request is made. (5)The landlord shall— (a)where such facilities are for the inspection of any documents, make them so available free of charge; (b)where such facilities are for the taking of copies or extracts, be entitled to make them so available on payment of such reasonable charge as he may determine. (6)The requirement imposed on the landlord by subsection (5)(a) to make any facilities available to a person free of charge shall not be construed as precluding the landlord from treating as part of his costs of management any costs incurred by him in connection with making those facilities so available.
Judge F J Silverman as Chairman Date 08 February 2022
12
Note:
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL].
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Invalid Section 22 Notice Rejects Manager Appointment
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds Reasonable Interim Service Charge Demand
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Application for Rent Repayment Order Rejected by First-tier Tribun…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Financial Penalty Upheld for Unlicensed HMO Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Validity of Service Charges and Notices
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Upholds Penalties for Unlicensed HMO Operation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Service Charge Challenge Dismissed Due to Lack of Payment Demand
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Major Works Funding Application Due to Incomple…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds Reasonableness of Insurance Premiums
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Complies with Section 20 Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Loses Challenge to Service Charges
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- A tenant is entitled to challenge the reasonableness of service charges but must provide sufficient evidence.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A tenant cannot challenge the reasonableness of a service charge without a demand for payment having been made.
- An application for major works funding cannot be approved until all tender information is complete.
- A tenant cannot apply for a rent repayment order more than 12 months after the last date on which the offence was committed.
- A landlord must comply with the consultation requirements under Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- Service charges and major works notices are valid if they comply with the statutory requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- A tenant is required to pay service and administration charges as determined by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The claimant's application to determine the reasonableness of service charges was dismissed.
Who was involved?
The claimant, a tenant, and the landlord's managing agents were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove their status as a tenant and the reasonableness of the service charges.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 sections 18, 19, 20, 20B, and 27A were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the claimant's failure to provide evidence proving their status as a tenant and the reasonableness of the service charges.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they provide sufficient evidence to prove their status as a tenant and the reasonableness of the service charges.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence and documents that mattered included proof of tenant status and detailed evidence regarding the reasonableness of the service charges.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
