VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £800

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £800 per month for a property, effective from May 29, 2025, after evaluating the property's condition and comparing it to similar properties.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal, taking into account the property's condition and comparables.

Topics

tenancy disputesfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £800 per calendar month for a property, effective from 29 May 2025.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £800 per calendar month for a property, effective from 29 May 2025, after considering the property's condition and comparables.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00HE/F77/2025/0607

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 33 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £800.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 29 May 2025

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because rent determined does not exceed MFR. (please see calculation overleaf)

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 814.50 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 29 May 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 395.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 360.4

X 395.3 Minus Y 360.4 = (A) 34.9

(A) 34.9 Divided by Y 360.4 = (B) 0.0968

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1468

Last registered rent* £710.00 Multiplied by (C) = £814.25 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £814.50

Variable service charge N/A If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £814.50 Per Calendar Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : HAV/00HE/F77/2025/0607

Property : 33 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] : None

Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : None

Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Type of Application : Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] H [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Hearing : 29 May 2025

Date of Decision : 29 May 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £800 per with effect from 29 May 2025.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

Background 1. On 4th November 2024 the Rent Officer received an application by the Landlord for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was previously registered at £710 per calendar month on 19th December 2022 following a determination by the Rent Officer.

3. On 19th December 2024 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £788 per calendar month to take effect from 19th December 2024.

4. On 16th January 2025 the Landlord objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal inspected the property on 29 May 2025 in the presence of the Landlord and Tenant.

6. The Tribunal noted that the property comprises a semi-detached house built in the 19th century and constructed with stone and rendered walls. The main roof is pitched and slated and later rear additions have corrugated asbestos and polycarbonate pitched roofs.

7. The accommodation comprises: -

Ground Floor: Entrance Hall, Living room, rear Dining area and Kitchen in lean to additions. Small lobby with WC off dining area. First Floor: Split landing with low height.3 bedrooms. Bathroom with bath and wash basin only. Outside lawned open plan front garden. Access to rear shared with neighbour. Raised back garden with retaining wall at rear. The property has partial double glazing and is heated principally by night storage heaters. Hearing 8. The case was listed for hearing at Truro Magistrates Court. At the inspection the Tenant indicated that she was unable to travel to Truro to take part. After a brief adjournment the Tribunal determined, with the agreement of the parties, that in the interests of justice it could hear the case at the property. Evidence

9. The Tribunal has considered the oral and written submissions provided by both the Tenant and the Landlord. It has also examined information freely available on the internet.

10. The Landlord indicated that the registered rent was too low and referred to comparables provided. He considered that improvements were carried out between 2018 and 2021 in the form of re-rendering the flank wall, repairs to the rear garden retaining wall, installing plastic fittings in the bathroom to replace lead and repairing a leak over the rear porch lintel. He felt that these increased the rental value. He considered there was no scarcity of similar properties to rent and cited comparables.

11. The Tenant stated that the house needs modernisation, a WC on the first floor, better natural lighting in parts and rewiring. Determination and Valuation 12. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,300 per calendar month.

13. The Tribunal went on to consider allowances to reflect differences between this property and average properties of this type.

14. The Tribunal noted that the property has physical limitations in headroom largely due to the layout of the structure and parts being in rear additions with walls of single-skin thickness under either polycarbonate or corrugated asbestos roofs. The lack of a first floor WC was also considered. We consider that these matters should be reflected in an initial adjustment of market rent to £1,125 per calendar month.

15. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord and the Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

16. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. The Tribunal has also made adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration, the lack of central heating, aged electrical installation, poor insulation of parts of the structure and the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings 17. The Tribunal noted the number of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.

18. The full valuation is shown below:

Full open market rent in good condition £1,300 Adjusted for physical layout, ceiling height, lean-to additions as above £1,125 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration £40 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£30 Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains

£40

Limited heating / lack of central heating

£40 Lean-to additions, limited insulation

£50

Dated kitchen bathroom and wc

£100 Dated electrical installation

£25

____

Total deduction per month

£325

TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£800

19. Having made the adjustments indicated above, the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 is £800 per calendar month.

20. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is below the maximum fair rent of £814.50 per calendar month permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice, and accordingly we determine that the limit set by the Order does not apply in this case.

Right to appeal

1.

A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office, which has been dealing with the case.

2.

The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3.

If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, that person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4.

The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition.
  • The fair rent is adjusted for the local rental market.
  • The fair rent considers improvements made to the property.
  • The fair rent is calculated using the Retail Price Index.
  • The fair rent takes into account the tenant's responsibilities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £800 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and comparables with similar properties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to others.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may expect their fair rent to be determined similarly, considering the property's condition and comparables.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparables and the condition of the property were important in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.