VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £805 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property, setting it at £805 per month. The decision was based on the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, which caps the rent to ensure it remains fair.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

tenancyfair rentrent control

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property, applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to cap the rent at £805 per month.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property, applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to cap the rent at £805 per month, effective from 12 September 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00HQ/F77/2025/0626

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £805.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 12 September 2025

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £940.00 per Calendar Month.

[NAME] of decision 12 September 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 406.20

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 374.20

X 406.20 Minus Y 374.20 = (A) 32.00

(A) 32.00 Divided by Y 374.20 = (B) 0.0855

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1355

Last registered rent* £708.75 Multiplied by (C) = £804.79 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £805.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £805.00 Per Calendar Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/00HQ/F77/2025/0626 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : [NAME] :

None

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : [COUNSEL] of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Objection : 9th July 2025 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons :

12th September 2025

DECISION The Tribunal determines a Fair Rent of £805 per month with effect from 12th September 2025.

HAV/00HQ/F77/2025/0626

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 13th January 2025 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was previously registered at £708.75 per month including services following a determination by the Property Tribunal.

3. On 19th June 2025 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £755 per month for the property to take effect from the 26th July 2025. The Rent Officer indicated an estimate for services included within the rent in the sum of £69.24 per month.

4. On 9th July 2025 the Landlord’s Agent objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

6. The Tribunal has considered the written appeal from the Landlord’s Agent. There were no additional submissions from either party. Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and its own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,200 per calendar month.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets/floor coverings and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord. The Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

9. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets/flooring and curtains/blinds all supplied therefore some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In addition, the Tribunal has made the adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration and for dated kitchen and bathroom fittings 10. The Tribunal noted the numbers of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.

HAV/00HQ/F77/2025/0626

3 11. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1,200 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration

£40 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£30 Tenant’s provision of carpets/floorings

£30 Tenant’s provision of curtains/blinds

£10 Dated kitchen fittings

£100 Dated bathroom fittings

£50

____

Total deduction per month

£260 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£940

12. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £940 per calendar month.

13. The statutory Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is above the maximum fair rent of £805 permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Accordingly, the lower amount of £805 per month is to be registered as the Fair Rent with effect from 12th September 2025, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

14. The Tribunal noted that the Landlord has recently installed central heating within the property. The Tribunal considered that this would increase the rental value by 10%. This would be insufficient to ‘override’ the application of the Maximum Fair Rent Order.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the fair rent using comparable evidence and its expert knowledge of local rental values.
  • The property's open market rent was reduced due to the tenant's responsibility for internal decoration.
  • The rent was further reduced because the tenant provided white goods.
  • The rent was also reduced because the kitchen and bathroom fittings were dated.
  • The registered fair rent was capped at £805 per month because of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the fair rent for the property at £805 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court applied the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to determine the fair rent, ensuring it was capped at £805 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to cap the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case, as the rent was capped at a lower rate than initially proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For tenants in a similar situation, the rent may be capped at a level determined by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence of rental values in the area was considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.