VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £850 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £850 per month for a property, considering factors like the property's condition and market value.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £850 per month for a property, taking into account various deductions and adjustments.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £850 per month for a property, taking into account the current market conditions and the state of the property, including disrepair issues.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00ML/F77/2025/0612

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Judge Percival

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £850.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 7 May 2025

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £888.50 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 7 May 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 395.30

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 372.80

X 395.30 Minus Y 372.80 = (A) 22.50

(A) 22.50 Divided by Y 372.80 = (B) 0.0604

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999? NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1104

Last registered rent* £800.00 Multiplied by (C) = £888.32 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £888.50

Variable service charge? NO If YES add amount for services n/a

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £888.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/00ML/F77/2025/0612 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] :

None

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : None Type of Application :

Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : [NAME] Mr [NAME] Judge R Percival Date of Objection : 2nd March 2025 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons :

7th May 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £850 per month with effect from 7th May 2025.

HAV/00ML/F77/2025/0612

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 10th January 2025 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was previously registered at £800 per month on 4th April 2023 following a determination by the First-Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property).

3. On 25th February 2025 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £875 per month for the property to take effect from 4th April 2025.

4. On 2nd March 2025 the Tenant objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

6. Following the Tenant’s objection no further representations were made by either party. Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,300 per month.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord. The Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

9. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied therefore some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In addition, the Tribunal has made the adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration, disrepair due to dampness and electrical wiring.

10. The Tribunal noted the numbers of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.

HAV/00ML/F77/2025/0612

3 11. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1,300 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration

£40 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£30 Tenant’s provision of carpets

£60 Tenant’s provision of curtains

£20 Dated kitchen and bathroom fittings

£200 Disrepair due to damp

£100

____

Total deduction per month

£450 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£850

12. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £850 per calendar month.

13. This rent takes effect from 7th May 2025, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

14. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is below or equal to the maximum fair rent of £888.50 permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly we determine that the limit set by the Order does not apply in this case.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects current market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the state of the property.
  • The tribunal determines the fair rent based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £850 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and market value to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the property's condition and market value was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and market value when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and information about the property's condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.