VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £184.62 per week. This decision was based on the current market conditions and the state of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property.

Topics

fair rent determinationmaximum fair rentrent act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property based on comparable evidence and adjustments for the property's condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £184.62 per week for a property, considering comparable evidence and adjustments for the property's condition, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/19UJ/F77/2025/0609

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Judge Clark

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £184.62 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 3 April 2024

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £186.00 per week prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 3 April 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 394.00

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Jan 2023 Y 360.30

X 394.00 Minus Y 360.30 = (A) 33.70

(A) 33.70 Divided by Y 360.30 = (B) 0.0936

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999? NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1436

Last registered rent* £162.60 Multiplied by (C) = £185.95 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £186.00

Variable service charge? NO If YES add amount for services n/a

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £186.00 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/19UJ/F77/2025/0609 Property : 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : None Type of Application :

Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Judge Clark Date of Objection : 2nd February 2025 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons :

3rd April 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £184.62 per week with effect from 3rd April 2025.

HAV/19UJ/F77/2025/0609 2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 6th December 2024 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent of £187 per week for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was last registered at £162.60 per week on 25th January 2023 following a determination by the First-Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential property).

3. On 24th January 2025 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £175 per week for the property to take effect from 6th March 2025.

4. On 2nd February 2025 the Tenant objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

6. The Tribunal has considered the written submission provided by the Tenant in his letter of objection. There were no written submissions from the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided, and of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,150 per calendar month. Market rents are usually expressed as a monthly figure.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord. The Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

9. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied therefore some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In addition, the Tribunal has made adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration, the lack of central heating/ poor Energy Performance Rating and the unmodernised kitchen.

10. The Tribunal noted the number of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.

11. The Energy Performance Rating for the property is ‘E’.

HAV/19UJ/F77/2025/0609 3 12. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1,150 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration

£50 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£30 Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains/blinds £50 Lack of central heating/poor EPC rating

£120 Unmodernised kitchen

£100

____

Total deduction per month

£350 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£800

13. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £800 per calendar month which equates to £184.62 per week.

14. This rent is effective from 3rd April 2025, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

15. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is below the maximum fair rent of £186 per week permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly we determine that the limit set by the Order does not apply in this case.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the open market rent.
  • The open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition was considered to be £1,150 per calendar month.
  • Deductions were made for the tenant's liability for internal decoration.
  • Deductions were made for the tenant providing white goods, carpets, and curtains/blinds.
  • Deductions were made due to the lack of central heating and a poor Energy Performance Rating.
  • The determined fair rent was below the maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £184.62 per week for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered comparable evidence and adjusted the rent based on the property's condition.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent to similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be adjusted based on the current market conditions and the state of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the state of the property were important in making the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.