First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Bristol Property at £191.50 Weekly

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HB/F77/2023/0009

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 9 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [APPELLANT]

[NAME]

Tenant Miss B [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £191.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 21 April 2023

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £240.00 per Week.

[NAME] of decision 21 April 2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 364.5

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 280.7

X 364.5 Minus Y 280.7 = (A) 83.8

(A) 83.8 Divided by Y 280.7 = (B) 0.2985

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.3485

Last registered rent* £142.00 Multiplied by (C) = 191.48 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £191.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £191.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

Case reference : CHI/00HB/F77/2023/0009

[NAME] : 9 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenant : Miss B [COUNSEL] :

Respondent Landlord : [NAME] :

Type of application : Determination of registered rent

pursuant to Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal member(s) : [NAME]

[NAME]

Mr [NAME] of decision : 21 April 2023

DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Decision of the Tribunal

On 21 April 2023 the Tribunal determined that a sum of £191.50 per week will be registered as the Fair Rent, with effect from the same date.

Background

1. On 8 November 2022, the landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a Fair Rent of £100.10 per week for the [NAME].

2. On 4 January 2023, the Rent Officer registered a rent of £150.69 per week, effective the same date.

3. On 1 February 2023, the tenant objected to the registered rent.

4. The tenancy appears to be a statutory protected periodic tenancy commencing 27 October 1986. The Tribunal were not provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement.

5. According to the Rent Register, the landlord is responsible for repairs and external decorations, whilst the tenant covenants to decorate internally. Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies.

6. On 3 March 2023, the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. The parties were also advised that no inspection would be undertaken. No such objections were received.

7. The Directions required the landlord and tenant to submit their completed statements to the Tribunal by 17 March 2023 and 31 March 2023 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party.

8. Neither party filed submissions. The only evidence before the Tribunal was the tenant’s email to the Valuation Office Agency (“VOA”) dated 1 February 2023 and the landlord’s Application for Registration of Fair Rent form dated 7 November 2023.

9. Having reviewed the application, the Tribunal concluded that the matter was capable of being determined fairly, justly and efficiently on the papers, consistent with the overriding objective of the Tribunal.

10. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised in the application. They do not recite each point. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its view, go to the heart of the application.

Law 11. When determining a Fair Rent the Tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the [NAME]. It also must disregard the effect if any of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the

3

[NAME].

12. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the [NAME] discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject [NAME].

13. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 restricts the amount by which the rent, less variable service charge, may be increased to a maximum 5.00% plus Retail Price Index since the last registration.

14. Under paragraph 7 of the Order an exemption to this restriction applies where the Landlord proves that repairs or improvements undertaken have increased the rent by at least 15% of the previous registered rent.

The [NAME]

15. In accord with current policy, the Tribunal did not inspect the [NAME], instead relying on information provided and viewing the [NAME] via online portals.

16. The [NAME] is a mid-terraced house constructed circa 1890 – 1918, with a solid brick front elevation beneath a pitched and tiled roof. The [NAME] is situated in a predominantly residential area, close to local amenities and within easy access of the M32 motorway.

17. The accommodation comprises a reception room and [NAME]/diner at ground level, and two bedrooms and a bathroom to the first floor. There is a small garden to the front and a further garden at the rear. There are no private parking provisions or garage; street parking is available on a first come first served basis.

18. The [NAME] has partial double glazing and full central heating, both provided by the landlord. The tenant refers to the rear of the [NAME] being single glazed.

19. White goods, furniture, carpets and curtains are supplied by the tenant.

20. No service charge or charges for utilities are levied.

4

Submissions – Tenant

21. The following reasons for challenging the Rent Officers determination of rent are extracted from the tenant’s email to the VOA dated 1 February 2023:

a. The rent increase is unreasonable due to the “bad condition of the [NAME]”. b. The [NAME] has fallen into disrepair as a result of a failure on the part of the landlord to complete repairs and maintenance, including: i. Black mould ii. Ceiling leaks iii. Rotten fascia boards iv. Rotten wooden window frames at the rear of the [NAME] v. [NAME] and bathroom fixtures require replacing.

Submissions – Landlord

22. None.

Determination

23. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the [NAME] in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Neither party submitted any evidence in such regard and the Tribunal therefore relied on its own experience as a specialist expert Tribunal and its knowledge of rental values locally. The Tribunal determined such figure to be £300.00 per week.

24. Once the hypothetical rent, in good condition, was established, it was necessary for the Tribunal to adjust the figure to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition and facilities of the actual [NAME] at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, of which there were none.

25. The Tribunal noted that properties available on the open market were generally modern or modernised, with central heating, white goods, floor and window coverings provided by the landlord. In contrast, the tenant stated, and the landlord did not dispute, that the [NAME] and bathroom fixtures require replacement and that there is a lack of general maintenance on the part of the landlord. The Tribunal also note the tenant’s provision of white good, floor coverings and carpets. In reflection of such differences, the Tribunal makes a deduction of 15% from the hypothetical open market rent.

26. Furthermore, the tenant is responsible for the internal decoration of the [NAME]. The Tribunal considers such a covenant a greater burden than the normal responsibility for an assured shorthold tenant to keep the landlords’ decorations in good order. Accordingly, the Tribunal allow an additional deduction of 5%.

5

27. Deducting a total of 20% from the hypothetical rent, the Tribunal arrived at an adjusted rent of £240.00 per week.

28. The Tribunal then directed itself to the question of scarcity, as referenced in paragraph 12 above and, in arriving at its decision on the point, takes account of the following:

a. The Tribunal interpreted the ‘locality’ for scarcity purposes as being the whole area of Bristol (i.e. a sufficiently large area to eliminate the effect of any localised amenity which would, in itself, tend to increase or decrease rent); b. Availability of [NAME] to rent; c. Local Authority and Housing Association waiting lists; d. House and rental prices which could be an indicator of increased availability of housing and a reduction in scarcity; e. The absence of submissions on the point by the parties; f. The members of the Tribunal have, between them, many years of experience of the residential letting market and that experience, coupled with the above, leads them to the view that there is currently no shortage of similar houses to let in the locality defined above.

29. Accordingly, the Tribunal made no deduction for scarcity.

Maximum Fair Rent

30. This is the rent calculated in accordance with the Maximum Fair Rent Order details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice.

31. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999 restricts the amount by which the rent, less any variable service charge, may be increased, to a maximum 5% plus RPI since the last registration.

32. The only exception to this restriction is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. The Tribunal determined that such exception does not apply in this instance.

33. The rent to be registered in this application is limited by the Fair Rent Acts’ (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999 because it is above the maximum fair rent that can be registered of £191.50 per week prescribed by the Order.

34. The Tribunal accordingly determines that the Maximum Fair Rent of £191.50 per week is registered as the Fair Rent with effect from 21 April 2023, that being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. The rent is to be registered as fixed.

6

RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.