VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Harrow Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £1008.00 per month for a a person in Harrow, considering factors like the condition and location of the a person under UK law.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the relevant tenancy legislation, a fair rent is determined by assessing the property's condition and applying a cap based on the retail price index.

Topics

fair rent determinationrent control

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 s.70Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting for its condition and applying a cap based on inflation.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1008.00 per month for a property in Harrow, considering the condition and locality of the property under the Rent Act 1977 and applying the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. SH/LON/00AQ/F77/2023/0200

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 10 [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1008.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 5th September 2023

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £1129.50 per month.

[NAME] of decision 5th September 2023

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 374.20

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 301.9

X 374.20 Minus Y 301.90 = (A) 72.30

(A) 72.30 Divided by Y 301.90 = (B) 0.23948

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.28948

Last registered rent* £871.00 Multiplied by (C) = £1123.13 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1123.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services no

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1123.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: SH/LON/OOAQ/F77/MDR/2023/0200 [NAME] : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Miss [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] (Hons) MA LLM

FRICS HMCTS Code : On papers Date of Decision : 5th September 2023 Date of Statement of Reasons: 5th September 2023 _______________________________________________

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

2

Decision 1.The decision of the tribunal is that a fair rent of £1008.00 per month is determined with an effective date of 5th September 2023. Background 2. An application was made to re-register a fair rent, dated 27th April 2023 by the [NAME]. Prior to the application to re-register a fair rent, the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £850.00 per month, with effect from 26th May 2021.

3. Subsequently the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £871.00 per month, attributed to services with effect from 20th July 2023.

4. In an email of 27th June 2023, the landlord objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal ([NAME] Chamber) ([NAME]).

5. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 12th July 2023. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the [NAME] and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The [NAME]

6. The tribunal did not inspect the [NAME], nor did either party request an inspection, and one was not considered proportionate. The [NAME] comprises a self contained purpose built flat of around 1935, the [NAME] is on the first floor, and has a reception room, two bedrooms, and kitchen/dinner with a bathroom. Relevant Law 7. Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as

3

amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded-

4

(a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the [NAME]. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the [NAME]. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the [NAME] discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be

5

adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject [NAME]).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord 8. No submissions from the landlord were received, other than the objection to the rent registered and the application form seeking £ 235.38 per week, equivalent to £1019.98 per month. The application notes, new windows, an electrical upgrade and a new boiler. Tenant 9. No submissions were received from the tenant. The Determination 10. The matter was addressed on papers. Reasons for Decision

6

11. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.

12. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject [NAME] and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material.

13. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the [NAME] in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the rent was £1750.00 per month if let on a contemporary assured shorthold basis.

14. The [NAME] is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent, therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 20% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. The calculation 15. The rent of £1.750.00 per month is on the basis of an assured shorthold tenancy where the tenant would not be responsible for the service charge.

16. The rent prior to adjustment for condition, terms and scarcity, but adjusted for service charge is Market rent £1750.00 per month Less 20% for condition Less £350.00 per month -------------------------- £ 1400.00 per month

7

Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods £140.00 per month ------------------------------------------- £1260.00 per month Less 20% for scarcity. £252.00 per month ------------------------------------------

17. The rent after this final adjustment was £1008.00 per month. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 18. The rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £1008.00 per month. This figure is lower than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £1123.50 per month.

19.

Accordingly, the sum of £1008.00 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 5th September 2023 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 5th September 2023 Extended reasons: 5th September 2023

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME] Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

8

b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent calculation takes into account the Retail Price Index and relevant service charges.
  • The fair rent reflects the property's market value, adjusted for certain factors.
  • The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal, considering the property's characteristics and market conditions.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • A landlord can reasonably expect to obtain a specified amount per quarter as a fair rent based on the property's condition and local market conditions.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition of the property and market comparables, adjusted for statutory limitations.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their fair rent calculated according to the prescribed formula in the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It determined that the fair rent for a property is £1008.00 per month.

Who was involved?

The landlord and tenant of a property in Harrow, Middlesex.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered market conditions and statutory requirements under UK law to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Rent Act 1977 s.70 and Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and market comparables influenced the decision on fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It was a neutral determination based on statutory requirements.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

They should consider market conditions and statutory rules when determining fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and comparable rental data were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, but permission must be sought within 28 days from the First-tier Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice for such matters.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.