VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property, considering various factors including the Retail Price Index. The final fair rent was set at £859 per month, as required by the Rent Act 1977 and related regulations.

⚖️ Legal holding

The fair rent for a property is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rent determinationmaximum fair rent calculation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property, adjusting it according to the Retail Price Index and other factors.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a property, adjusting it according to the Retail Price Index and other factors, and capped it at £859 per month under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/29UH/F77/2025/0635

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr I Perry FRICS Mr S Hodges FRICS Judge Cowan

Landlord Mrs [NAME]

Tenant Mrs [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £859.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 12 December 2025

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £920.00 per Calendar Month.

Chairman Mr I Perry BSc FRICS Date of decision 12 December 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 407.40

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 376.60

X 407.40 Minus Y 376.60 = (A) 30.80

(A) 30.80 Divided by Y 376.60 = (B) 0.0818

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999? NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1318

Last registered rent* £758.75 Multiplied by (C) = £858.75 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £859.00

Variable service charge? NO If YES add amount for services n/a

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £859.00 Per Calendar Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/29UH/F77/2025/0635 Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] :

None

Landlord : Mrs [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry FRICS Mr S J Hodges FRICS Judge Cowan Date of Objection : 17th October 2025 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons : 12th December 2025

DECISION

HAV/29UH/F77/2025/0635

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 22nd July 2025 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was previously registered at £758.75 per month on 10th August 2023 following a determination by the Rent Officer.

3. Following a request from the Tenant the Rent Officer held a consultation at the property on 10th September 2025. Both parties were present.

4. On 15th September 2025 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £793 per month for the property to take effect from the 15th September 2025.

5. On 17th October 2025 the Landlord objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 6. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

7. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord which had been copied to the opposing party. Determination and Valuation 8. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and of it’s own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,350 per month.

9. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets/floorings and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord. The Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

10. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets/floorings and curtains/blinds all supplied therefore some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In addition, the Tribunal has made the adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration, the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings, and the dated condition of the property and general wants of repair.

HAV/29UH/F77/2025/0635

3 11. The Tribunal noted the numbers of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.

12. The Energy Performance Rating for the property is ‘D’.

13. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1350 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration

£50 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£30 Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains

£50 Dated kitchen

£125 Dated bathroom

£75 General dated condition and wants of repair

£100

____

Total deduction per month

£430 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£920

14. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £920 per calendar month.

15. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is above the maximum fair rent of £859 per month permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Accordingly, the lower amount of £859 per month is to be registered as the Fair rent with effect from 12th December 2025, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition and local rental market rates.
  • The fair rent is based on the property's condition, location, and market comparables, adjusted for deficiencies or improvements.
  • The fair rent reflects current market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
  • The fair rent is calculated based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.
  • The fair rent reflects the actual condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A landlord's application for re-registering a fair rent is dismissed if recent improvements do not add more than 15% value to the previous rent.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977, subject to statutory caps, but the case was dismissed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property was set at £859 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Retail Price Index and other factors to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the Retail Price Index was crucial in determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect their fair rent to be similarly capped.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the Retail Price Index data were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.