First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement. They set the rent at £4480 per quarter, considering the market rent and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for scarcity and the condition of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £4480 per quarter for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement, taking into account the market rent and scarcity of similar properties in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AG/F77/2022/0060
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT] & [COMPANY]
Tenant [RESPONDENT]
1. The fair rent is £4480 Per quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 5 July 2022
3. The amount for services is £201 54 Per quarter
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £4713 per quarter including £201.54 per quarter for services prescribed by the Order.
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 5 July 2022
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 337.1
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 291.0
X 337.1 Minus Y 291.0 = (A) 46.1
(A) 46.1 Divided by Y 291 = (B) 0.15842
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.20842
Last registered rent* £3900 Multiplied by (C) = £4712.84 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £4713
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £4713 Per quarter
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00AG/F77/2022/0060
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] N2NW6 1HJ
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 19 August 2021
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 5 July 2022 hearing
remote hearing on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The registered rent with effect from 5 July 2022 is £4480 per quarter.
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE, a paper determination which is not provisional. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which I have recorded.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 23 June 2021 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £4497.11 inclusive of £222.40 fixed service charge per quarter for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £3900 per quarter which had been determined by the tribunal on 20 September 2019 with effect from the same date.
3. On 5 August 2021, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £3805 per quarter inclusive of £201.54 service charge with effect from 20 September 2021.
4. On 19 August 2020 the landlord objected to the registered rent.
5. The tenant occupies under the terms of a tenancy agreement which commenced on 1 January 1964.
6. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the application being dealt with on the papers. Neither party objected. No written representations were received from the tenant, nor were any written representations were received from or on behalf of the landlord.
The Law
7. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect if any of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
8. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the [NAME] (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as
necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation
9. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of rental values in West Hampstead and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £7800 per quarter.
10. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £7800 per quarter to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The Tribunal noted that properties available on the open market were modern or modernised, with white goods, floor and window coverings. The Tribunal considered that these differences and the terms and conditions of the tenancy required a deduction of £2200 per quarter.
11. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £5600 per quarter. The Tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The Tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is £4480 per quarter.
Decision
12. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £4480 per quarter which is below the maximum fair rent of £4713 per quarter which can be charged under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
14. Accordingly, the sum of £4480 per quarter will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 5 July 2022 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 5 July 2022
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £225 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a Property in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £2040 per Quarter
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £304 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent in Bristol Property Case
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent reflects the current market rent adjusted for scarcity.
- The property's condition is taken into account when determining the fair rent.
- The landlord's application complies with the Maximum Fair Rent calculation under the Rent Acts Order.
- The court considers local market conditions and statutory adjustments to determine fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The fair rent does not adequately consider the property's condition.
- The determination of fair rent does not strictly adhere to statutory guidelines.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair rent of £4480 per quarter for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in a regulated tenancy agreement.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the market rent and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment of the market rent for scarcity and the condition of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for scarcity.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market rent and scarcity when negotiating a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the market rent and the condition of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving regulated tenancy agreements.
