VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for London Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property in London. They took into account the property's condition, its location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The fair rent was set at £1520 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for scarcity and the condition of the property.

Topics

fair rent determinationregulated tenancyscarcity adjustment

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property in London, considering various factors including the property's condition and location.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1520 per month for a property in London, considering the property's condition, location, and scarcity of similar properties in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON00BK//F77/2025/0240

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1520 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 21 October 2025

3. The amount for services is not applicable £ Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because it is below the maximum fair rent of £1600 per month prescribed by the Order.

Chairman E [NAME] of decision 21 October 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 407.7

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 374.2

X 407.7 Minus Y 374.2 = (A) 33.5

(A) 33.5 Divided by Y 374.2 = (B) 0.08952

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.13952

Last registered rent* £1404 Multiplied by (C) = £1599.89 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1600

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1520 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00BK/F77/2025/0240

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

[COMPANY] of Application : 3 July 2025

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 21 October 2025 Hearing remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

This has been a hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because, no-one requested the same and I determined that the matter could be dealt with on the papers. The documents which I was referred to were in a bundle the contents of which I have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 21 October 2025 is £1520 per month.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 30 April 2025 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £1540 per month for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £1404 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 13 July 2023 with effect from the same date.

3. On 26 June 2025, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £1466.25 per month with effect from 13 July 2025.

4. The landlord objected to the registered rent on 3 July 2025.

5. The tribunal issued Directions on 28 August 2025. No written representations were received from or on behalf of either the landlord or the tenant.

The Law

6. When determining a fair rent I, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. I also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. I am unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.

7. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation 8. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party provided any comparable evidence I relied on my own general knowledge of rents within Nw8

and surrounding areas and concluded that if the flat were in the condition usually found on the open market it would let for £2700 per month.

9. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £2700 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £800 to reflect no central heating, lack of modernisation, floor coverings, curtains and white goods and difference in terms and conditions.

10. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £1900 per month. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar sized properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% for scarcity. The uncapped fair rent is £1520 per month.

Decision

11. The uncapped fair rent initially determined for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £1600 per month calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will not be capped under the provisions of the Order.

12. Accordingly, the sum of £1520 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 21 October 2025 being the date of my decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 21 October 2025

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to

allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a capped fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and local market rates, adjusted for scarcity.
  • A landlord must consider the age, location, and state of repair of a property when registering a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for the property's condition and scarcity of similar properties.
  • The fair rent is determined by the lower of the two figures calculated under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £1520 per month for a property in London.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition, location, and scarcity of similar properties to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The scarcity of similar properties in the area was a key factor in setting the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the fair rent was set according to the property's condition and scarcity.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the scarcity of similar properties when disputing a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties was likely presented.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.