VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Agreement

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a tenancy agreement, using a specific calculation method under the Rent Act 1977. This ensures the rent is fair and follows the guidelines set by the government.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreementmaximum fair rent calculation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal sets a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a tenancy agreement under the Rent Act 1977, applying the calculation method specified in the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was made by Mr Anthony Harris LLM FRICS FCIArb on behalf of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/F77/2021/0075

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 14000.00 Per Year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 06 May 2021

3. The amount for services is 300.60 Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £14905.50 per Year including £300.60 per Year for services prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] [NAME] of decision Monday 10th May 2021

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 296.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 285.6

X 296.9 Minus Y 285.6 = (A) 11.3

(A) 11.3 Divided by Y 285.6 = (B) 0.0395658

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) No

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.0895658

Last registered rent* £13,680.00 Multiplied by (C) = £14905.261 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £14,905.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £14,905.50 Per Year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The fair rent is adjusted for scarcity and other relevant factors.
  • The fair rent calculation considers the Retail Price Index and the previous registered rent.
  • The fair rent determination takes into account all relevant circumstances including the property's condition and scarcity in the locality.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The fair rent determination includes statutory limitations that may affect the outcome.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the fair rent for a tenancy agreement.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used a specific calculation method to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation method for determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is calculated fairly according to the law.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant calculations were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.