VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £104 Per Week in Coventry Tenancy Case

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a property in Coventry under the Rent Act 1977. The tribunal decided that the fair rent should be £104 per week, effective from May 26, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their fair rent set by the First-tier Tribunal based on the Rent Act 1977 and relevant regulations.

Topics

fair rentRent Act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, setting it at £104 per week.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a tenancy under the Rent Act 1977, setting it at £104 per week. The effective date was set as 26/05/2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CQ/F77/2023/0009

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £104 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 26/05/2023

3. The amount for services is £0.45 Per week

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £122.50 per week prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 26/05/2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 367.2

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 290.6

X 367.2 Minus Y 290.6 = (A) 76.6 (A) 76.6 Divided by Y 290.6 = (B) 0.26359

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.31359

Last registered rent* £93 Multiplied by (C) = £122.1641 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £122.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £122.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent reflects market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
  • The fair rent is determined by the Rent Act 1977 and capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • A tenant is entitled to a maximum fair rent calculated according to the Retail Price Index and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A landlord's application for a new fair rent was dismissed if there was no significant change in the condition of the property or market conditions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the fair rent for a property at £104 per week.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in setting the fair rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court applied the Rent Act 1977 to determine the fair rent based on relevant regulations.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were used.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The calculation of fair rent based on the Rent Act provisions was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It is unclear without knowing which party initiated the case, but the outcome sets a specific fair rent figure.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a fair rent determination should consider applying relevant Rent Act provisions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and previous registered rent details were likely important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.