VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Purchase Price at £10,700

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that tenants can buy the freehold of their property for £10,700. This decision was based on a detailed valuation report and the terms of the lease.

⚖️ Legal holding

Tenants are entitled to purchase the freehold of their property under certain conditions.

Topics

enfranchisementvaluation of property

Provisions

Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s.26Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s.27

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal calculated the price for purchasing the freehold of a property in London.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the price to be paid into court for the purchase of the freehold of a property in London, setting it at £10,700. The decision was based on a valuation report and lease details.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: LON/OOAZ/OCE/2023/0154

Property : 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicants : [redacted] : [RESPONDENT]

Respondent: [redacted] : None

Type of [NAME] : Enfranchisement

Tribunal Members:

Judge Robert Latham

Richard Waterhouse FRICS

Venue of Hearing : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Date of Decision : 20 February 2024

________________________________

DECISION ________________________

Summary of Decision

(1) The Tribunal determines that price to be paid into court in respect of purchase of the freehold of 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is £10,700.

(2) The Tribunal approves the draft proposed transfer in form [NAME] which has been submitted by the Applicant, subject to the amendments specified at paragraph 14.

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. On 12 October 2023, Deputy District Judge Watterson, sitting in the County Court at Bromley, made an order pursuant to Section 26 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 ("the Act") dispensing with the requirement to serve an initial claim notice to acquire the freehold in of 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the “Property”). He further ordered that by virtue of section 27, the freehold of the Property shall vest in the Applicants on such terms as shall be determined by this Tribunal.

Evidence

2. We have been provided with a valuation report by Mr [NAME] MS BSc (Hons), dated 17 January 2024. He computes the premium to be £10,700. The Applicant has provided a [NAME] of Documents which extends to 136 pages.

Lease details

3. The Respondent missing [RESPONDENT] is the lessor of the Property which is an end of terrace property. It has been divided to create two flats. semi-detached two storey building which has two flats:

(i) The ground floor flat has two bedrooms, a lounge, bathroom and kitchen with access to a rear garden and side access which accommodates a lean-to. The size of the flat is 80.3 sqm.

(ii) The first floor flat has three bedrooms (one of which is ensuite), a kitchen, and a bathroom. A portion of the garden is included in the lease with access through the lean-to. The roof space has been converted since the lease was granted to provide further accommodation including two bedrooms and a bathroom. The roof is included within the demise of this flat. The Tribunal does not have regard to the roof extension in [NAME] its valuation as this is a tenant’s improvement. The size of the flat is 91.4 sqm.

4. The lease for the ground floor flat is dated 12 August 1997. It is for a term of 125 years from 12 August 1997. The rent is £100 pa for 33 years, increasing to £150pa for 33 years and £200 for the remaining 59 years. The unexpired term is therefore 99.2 years.

5. The lease for the first floor flat is dated 5 December 1997. It is for a term of 125 years from 5 December 1997. The rent is £100pa for 33 years, increasing to £150pa for 33 years and £200 for the remaining 59 years. The unexpired term is therefore 99.5 years.

Valuation date

6. The valuation date is 1 June 2023, namely the date of the [NAME] to the Court (s.27 (1) (b)).

3

Hypothetical Unimproved Freehold Value of the Flats

7. Mr [NAME] has computed the long leasehold value of the flats. He has had regard to three comparables:

(i) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]: This is a two bedroom flat with a garden of 78 sqm. It sold in August 2023 for £417,000.

(ii) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]: This is a two bedroom flat with a garden of 58 sqm. It sold in October 2022 for £360,000.

(iii) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]: This is a one bedroom flat with a garden of 65 sqm. It sold in May 2023 for £365.

8. Mr [NAME] has provided a table summarising the comparables at p.58 of the [NAME]. He has adjusted the comparable for size, floor level, condition and location. He has computed the unimproved freehold value of the ground floor flat to be £405,000 and the first floor flat to be £470,000. We accept these assessments.

Capitalisation Rate

9. Mr [NAME] adopted a capitalisation rate of the ground rent of 7%. We accept this, given the size and nature of the ground rents.

Deferment Rate

10. We approve the “Sportelli” rate of 5% for deferment which Mr [NAME] has adopted.

Relativity Rate

11. As the unexpired term for both leases is more than 80 years, no compensation for marriage value is payable.

Appurtenant Land

12. The communal land includes the external areas, communal spaces and areas undemised. There are no undemised areas. The communal spaces include areas bordered blue on the plans being all accessways as well as the area between the front wall and the boundary wall. It is considered that there is no value in this land because of the lessees' rights of way over it. Mr [NAME] computes the consideration for appurtenant land to be £1. We agree.

Calculation of the Premium

13. Mr [NAME] computes the premium for the Property to be £10,700. His calculation is at p.59-60 of his report. He has apportioned £5,113 to the

4

ground floor flat, £5,564 to the first floor flat and £1 to the appurtenant land. We approve these valuations.

The [NAME]

14. The Tribunal approved the [NAME] subject to the following amendments:

(i) Panel 8 should read: “The sum of £10,700 has been paid into Court less £___ (the costs awarded to the transferee)”.

(ii) Panel 10 must be completed.

Judge Robert Latham 20 February 2024

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant meets the conditions specified by the relevant legislation.
  • The appropriate premium for purchasing the freehold is determined according to statutory requirements.
  • Landlords can be exempted from consultation requirements if deemed reasonable and without causing prejudice.
  • Tenants are entitled to purchase the freehold interest under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
  • The valuation of ground rent and lease terms are considered when calculating the premium for acquiring the freehold.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the price for purchasing the freehold of a property in London at £10,700.

Who was involved?

The tenants and the missing landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used a valuation report and lease details to determine the price.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 sections 26 and 27 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The valuation report provided by an expert was crucial in determining the price.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenants.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to purchase the freehold of their property if they meet the legal requirements.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The valuation report and lease details were important in making the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving property law.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.