VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £750 for Two-Bedroom Flat

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £750 per month for a two-bedroom flat in High Wycombe, taking into account the a person's condition and location.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under Section 14 of the relevant statute, the Tribunal disregarded improvements made by tenants and focused on the reasonable market rent for the property.

Topics

market renttenancy disputeproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. This determination considers the condition, location, and comparable rents in the area.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a market rent of £750 per month for a two-bedroom flat, effective from January 17, 2025, after considering the property's condition, size, and location compared to similar properties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £750 per month for a two-bedroom flat in High Wycombe, considering its condition, location, and comparable rents in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: CAM/00MX/MNR/2024/0144

HMCTS

: Inspection & [NAME]

: 34A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant (Tenant) : [NAME] [APPELLANT] [COUNSEL]

Respondent (Landlord): [COUNSEL]

: [NAME] [RESPONDENT] of [NAME] : Determination of a market rent under

Section 13 of the [NAME]

Tribunal Members : Judge JR Morris

Miss M Krisko BSc (Est Man) BA FRICS

Date of Decision : 27th January 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

DECISION

1. The Tribunal determined that a market rent for the [NAME] in its present condition is £750.00 per calendar month to take effect from 17th January 2025.

[NAME]

2. The [NAME] is a two-bedroom flat on the ground and first floor of a two-storey mid-terraced building probably constructed in the late 19th early or 20th century. On the ground floor, numbered [ADDRESS], is a clothes shop. Access to the flat above is via a shared passage way between 32 and [ADDRESS]. The passageway gives access to the rear of numbers 30 to 40. 30 and 32 are residential houses, 36 and 38 are like 34 commercial premises with residential flats above. The [NAME] extends over the passageway which is open at both ends. Apart from the shop front the building has brick elevations under a pitched concrete tile roof. The door to the flat is upvc and there are upvc double glazed replacement windows. The facias are timber with upvc rainwater goods. There is no outside area to the demise only an FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

2 area covered by a polycarbonate shelter which gives access to the [NAME] and the flat above number 36. There is no off-street parking and street parking is restricted.

Accommodation Entry to the [NAME] is directly into the kitchenette. The [NAME] comprises, on the ground floor a galley kitchenette (5.5 m2) at the one end of which is the bathroom (2.5 m2) and at the other are stairs rising to a landing on the first floor which forms the living room (16.0 m2; 13.0 m2 excluding staircase). To one side of the living room is a small double bedroom (12.7 m2) and to the other side is small single bedroom (6.2 m2).

Services Space and water heating is by a gas fired central heating system. The [NAME] has mains electricity, gas, water, and drainage.

Furnishing The [NAME] is let with two chests of drawers and wardrobes, otherwise it is unfurnished. Carpets are provided by the Landlord which are overlaid by the Tenants’ rugs. The Landlord provided a fridge and washing machine at the beginning of the tenancy but these have been replaced by the Tenants. There is an electric cooker with gas hob in the kitchenette provided by the Landlord.

Location The [NAME] is situated in a residential street punctuated by shops on the edge of High Wycombe town centre.

THE TENANCY

3. The Tenancy commenced as a contractual monthly periodic Assured Shorthold Tenancy on 23rd October 2019 for a period of 12 months at a rent of £700.00 per calendar month and continued thereafter as a statutory tenancy on the same terms. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies in respect of the Landlord’s repairing obligations.

THE REFERRAL

4. The current rent is £700.00 per calendar month. By a notice in the prescribed form dated 21st June 2024 the Landlord proposed a new rent of £1,200.00 per calendar month from 21st August 2024.

5. On 20th August 2024 the Tenant referred the notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal. Directions were issued on 14th October 2024 informing the parties that the Tribunal did not intend to hold an oral hearing unless a request was made by 18th November 2024. Neither party made a request for a hearing. The Tenants completed the Reply Form attached to the Directions and an inspection took place on 17th January 2025.

6. The Tenants’ Representative sent representations by email on 16th October 2024. However, due to an oversight by the Tenants’ Representative the completed Reply Form was not received by the Tribunal until 13th January 2025 when a copy was also sent to [NAME]. It was not clear whether [NAME] had received the completed Reply Form in October. For the avoidance of doubt the

3 Tribunal gave the Landlord and Agent until 24th January 2025 to comment upon the Tenants’ completed Reply Form which they duly did.

THE LAW

7. The relevant law is in section 14 of the [NAME] which is summarised below.

8. By virtue of section 14 (1) [NAME] the Tribunal is to determine a rent at which the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured periodic tenancy- (a) having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the subject Tenancy

9. By virtue of section 14 (2) [NAME] in [NAME] a determination the Tribunal shall disregard – (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14(3) [NAME]) carried out by a tenant otherwise than as an obligation; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house due to the failure of the Tenant to comply with any terms of the subject Tenancy.

10. Nothing in section 14 affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).

11. By virtue of section 14 (7) [NAME] otherwise agreed between the Landlord and the Tenant the new rent shall take effect from the new period specified in the notice, if it appears to the tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.

REPRESENTATIONS

Tenant’s Written Representations

12. The Tenant in written representations stated that Carpets had been provided by the Landlord but due to their poor condition had been overlaid by the Tenants’ own carpets. In addition, it was stated that the Landlord had provided a fridge and washing machine at the beginning of the tenancy but due to them being in poor working order were replaced by the Tenants.

13. The Tenants also stated that: • In the kitchen the walls and cupboards were damp. • In the large bedroom there was damp and mould on the walls and behind the wardrobe which increases when it rained. They said they tried to control it using their own dehumidifiers. • In the bathroom there is a window but ventilation is poor which causes damp issues in winter.

4 • In the smaller bedroom, which is used primarily for storage the external wall is exposed to sunlight during the summer but becomes damp again in the winter.

14. The Tenants also said that they had been given permission by the occupier of the [NAME] next door to use that garden. As this is a private and separate arrangement between the Tenants and their neighbour outside the tenancy Agreement it is not a matter that the Tribunal can consider.

Landlord’s Written Representations

15. [NAME] stated in written representations that they had not been the managing agent from the commencement of the tenancy but been instructed in August 2024 due to their having already managed several of the Landlord’s properties around the town. The Landlord had already served the Notice of Increase and asked the Agent to negotiate the rent increase. The Tenants proposed a rent of £950 per calendar month. The Agent expressed the opinion that this was a market rate for 1 bedroom flat and the [NAME] had 2 bedrooms even though the Tenants are only using the second bedroom for storage. It was submitted that 2-bedroom flats on the same road as the [NAME] are rented out in the region of £1,200 - £1,500 per calendar month.

16. The Landlord provided carpets, curtains, a washing machine, and a fridge when the Tenants moved in and was not aware that they had stopped working and that the Tenants had purchased their own. If the Tenants had made him aware he would have arranged for new ones to be provided.

17. The Agent said that on its inspection of the [NAME] upon taking over management it was noticed that mould was forming in certain rooms and that repairs were required. The Agent immediately informed the landlord who began to arrange for contractors to clean the mould and redecorate with damp proof paint. On the day that the landlord visited with his contractors they were denied access by the Tenants who wanted to reschedule the work. The Landlord was charged a call out fee but was happy to reschedule. When the Tenants were contacted to re-schedule, he was informed that one of the Tenants was ill and that they had cleaned the mould off and had repainted, for which they were thanked.

18. The Agent said that the Tenants believed that the loft required insulation and that they would do it if the landlord provided the materials. Although it had been insulated not very long ago the Landlord was happy to look at it again, but he was not happy for the Tenants to carry out the work as it is a job for a specialist contractor.

19. The Landlord is aware that there are several outstanding issues which need addressing and is happy to carry out all repairs at the [NAME] but has not been able to do so due to one of the Tenants being ill and not being granted access. The Agent said the Tenants had been emailed regularly with a view to getting the work but without response.

5 CONDITION

20. The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] on 17th January 2025 accompanied by the Tenants. [NAME] attended and was happy for the Tribunal to inspect notwithstanding the Tenants did not admit him. At the inspection the Tribunal only viewed the [NAME] and no oral evidence was taken. The Tribunal found the [NAME] to be as described above. As to its condition the Tribunal found as follows.

21. Externally, the [NAME] is in generally fair condition except the gutter and downpipes needed attention and some re-pointing was required. There were a considerable number of items in the common areas at the rear some of which appeared to be waste. The shared passageway has no lighting and the ceiling is painted strip timber which is now showing signs of rot and has sections missing.

22. Internally, the Tribunal found that the kitchenette and bathroom is dated and basic and there is no extractor fan in either. The base of the wall in the kitchenette adjacent the staircase showed signs of damp and mould indicating rising damp. There were signs of damp on the timber floor and walls caused by condensation in the small single bedroom.

23. The Energy Performance Certificate for the [NAME] gives a rating of E. The Certificate states the walls are solid and this was confirmed at the inspection. At the inspection it was noted that on lifting the carpet where the [NAME] extends over the shared passageway in the small double bedroom it could be seen, between the floorboards, that there appeared to be no insulation between the timber ceiling of the passage way and the floor above [NAME] this a cold area in winter. The Certificate confirms the loft is satisfactorily insulated.

24. The [NAME] is inconveniently laid out for everyday living on two levels, with the bedrooms upstairs and bathroom downstairs, the living room upstairs and the kitchen downstairs. The stairs intrude into the living room and access to the bedrooms is through the living room. The carpets provided by the Landlord are thin and worn.

DETERMINATION

25. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a [NAME] by reference to rental values generally and to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality, in particular. The Tribunal does not take into account the present rent or the period of time for which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the existing rent.

26. The Tribunal only has jurisdiction to determine the rent. The Tribunal cannot take into account the personal circumstances of either a tenant or landlord. Therefore, the Tribunal cannot consider either the affordability of the rent for a particular tenant nor whether the rent reflects a rise in interest rates and its effect on an individual landlord’s mortgage repayments.

27. The Tribunal assesses a rent based upon the condition of the [NAME] at the time of the determination. It cannot consider the period for which a [NAME] might have been in disrepair prior to work being carried out by the Landlord. Equally it cannot consider work that is said to be intended or scheduled to take place in the future nor that it has not been possible to carry out work or replace appliances because the

6 Landlord has not been able to obtain access. The Landlord is expected to obtain the necessary access under the express or implied terms of the tenancy agreement.

28. The Tribunal took account of both parties’ representations regarding the condition of the [NAME] and the Tribunal’s own findings on its inspection. [NAME] stated that two-bedroom flats in the same road were in the region of £1,200.00 to £1,500.00 although neither party submitted evidence of rental values of specific properties comparable to the [NAME]. The Tribunal, therefore applied the knowledge and experience of its members to determine a market rent for the [NAME] considering rental values for such comparable properties it found in the locality.

29. The Tribunal was not able to find properties to let that were directly comparable in terms of age and construction but it did find that two-bedroom flats in the area that have been recently let or are currently on the market are within the range of £1,100.00 and £1,300.00. However, nearly all these flats are in modern purpose- built residential blocks. All have off street parking and some have communal grounds. They are well laid out on one level with entrance halls, off which are the bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen and living room. The flats are let in good decorative order with floorcoverings. They have modern bathrooms and kitchens with appliances. Those at the lower end are marginally larger and those at the upper end are significantly so, some with balconies. Those at the upper end also have door entry systems and secure parking.

30. The [NAME] in comparison is above business premises in a mixed commercial and residential street. There is no off-street parking and street parking is restricted. The layout of the [NAME] is inconvenient. The kitchen and bathroom are basic and dated. The [NAME] being of solid wall construction is prone to condensation [NAME] it susceptible to mould infestation. Therefore, considering the age, structure, condition, facilities, layout, and locality of the [NAME] in the context of other two-bedroom flats, the Tribunal determined that a market rent for the [NAME] is £750.00 per calendar month.

31. Pursuant to secton 14(7) it appeared to the Tribunal that it would cause the Tenant undue hardship for the new rent to commence on the date of specified in the Notice. therefore the Tribunal determined that it should take effect from 17th January 2025.

32. The Tribunal determined that a market rent for the [NAME] is £750.00 per calendar month to take effect from 17th January 2025.

Judge JR Morris

Caution: The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] for the purposes of reaching this decision. The inspection was not a structural survey and any comments about the condition of the [NAME] in this statement must not be relied upon as a guide to the structural or other condition of the [NAME].

APPENDIX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

7 1. If a party wishes to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case.

2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. CAM/00MX/MNR/2024/0144

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

[NAME] 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 34A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge JR Morris Miss M Krisko BSc (Est Man) BA FRICS

Landlord Mr a [RESPONDENT] C/o [RESPONDENT], 254A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 750.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17th January 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per N/A

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 23rd October 2019

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A two-storey mid terraced flat over commercial premises comprising a kitchenette and bathroom with w.c. on the ground floor and living room and two bedrooms on the first floor.

Judge J R Morris Date of Decision 27th January 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The flat's layout is inconvenient, with bedrooms upstairs and the bathroom downstairs, which impacts its market rent.
  • The flat's age, structure, and solid wall construction make it prone to condensation and mould, affecting its value.
  • The property lacks off-street parking and has restricted street parking, which lowers its market rent compared to other flats.
  • The kitchen and bathroom are basic and dated, which contributes to a lower market rent.
  • The Tribunal determined that a market rent of £750.00 per calendar month was appropriate for the flat's condition and location.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a market rent of £750 per month for a two-bedroom flat.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition, location, and comparable rents in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and location of the property were crucial in determining the market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and location when disputing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rents in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.