Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Agricultural Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the market rent for an agricultural tenancy after considering comparable properties and the state of the rented house. The rent was set at £920 per month, effective from March 1st, 2025.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a market rent that reflects the current condition and comparable properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property based on comparable lettings and adjustments for the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £920 per calendar month for an agricultural tenancy, taking into account comparable lettings and the condition of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/40UG/MNR/2025/0623
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 303 Bickenhall Farm Cottage Taunton Somerset [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Judge R Percival
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenants Mr [NAME] & Mrs [NAME]
1. The rent is: £920.00 Per Calendar Month (To exclude Water Rates and Council Tax, but to include any amounts in paras. 3 and 4)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 March 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured agricultural occupancy tenancy commenced 22 January 2002
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies. The landlord is responsible for all repairs and decorations.
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.
8. Description of premises A two-storey semi-detached house of traditional brick construction and pitched tiled roof. The accommodation is: ground floor – two reception rooms, kitchen and outside WC; first floor – three bedrooms and one bathroom/WC. Outside – garden and drive.
[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 27 March 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/40UG/MNR/2025/0623 Property : 303 Bickenhall Farm Cottage Taunton Somerset [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenants : Mr [COUNSEL] and Mrs [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [NAME] [RESPONDENT] : [NAME] [COUNSEL] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent - sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Judge R Percival Date of Application : 31 January 2025 Date of Decision :
27 March 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £920 (Nine Hundred and Twenty Pounds) Per Calendar Month with effect from 1 March 2025.
HAV/40 UG/MNR/2025/0623 2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 20 January 2025, the landlord’s representative served a notice under section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £925 per month in place of the existing rent of £820 per month to take effect from 1 March 2025.
2. On 31 January 2025 the tenants submitted their application to the Tribunal (the application is in fact dated 31 January 2024) under section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988, referring the landlord’s notice proposing a new rent for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. 4. 303 Bickenhall Farm Cottage is a two-storey semi-detached house of traditional brick construction and pitched tiled roof. The accommodation is: ground floor - two reception rooms, kitchen and outside WC; first floor – three bedrooms and one bathroom/WC. Outside there is a garden and drive. Evidence
5. The Tribunal gave Directions dated 19 February 2025. The dates by which the parties’ Rent Appeal Statements (‘Statement’) are to be completed and returned to the Tribunal are, the landlord - 5 March 2025 and the tenants – 19 March 2025.
6. The Tribunal has considered the Statement given by [NAME] [NAME] dated 21 February 2025 and copied to the tenants the same day. In addition, the Tribunal has considered the Statement given by the tenants to the Tribunal and copied to the landlord, dated 24 February 2025. Both Statements were given in accordance with the Tribunal’s Directions.
7. With respect to the property, [NAME] [NAME] included: the accommodation in outline; a selection of photographs; its features; and details of an improvement made.
8. The Tribunal has not been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement but understands the agricultural occupancy tenancy commenced on 22 January 2002.
9. To assist the Tribunal, [NAME] [NAME] has provided three comparable lettings’ properties in the range of £1,400 per calendar month to £1,500 per calendar month to which she has referred to reach her valuation of £1,400 per month, before adjustments in aggregate of £200 per month, to equal £1,200 per month and goes on to say ‘…significantly higher than the proposed £925 per month.’ 10. Mrs [NAME] confirms the outline accommodation and features of the property summarised by [NAME] [NAME], save that neither carpets, nor
HAV/40 UG/MNR/2025/0623 3 curtains, nor curtain poles were provided at the commencement of the tenancy. In addition, the off-street parking was ‘‘(built/maintained by tenant)’’ [sic].
11. Under ‘Improvements’, various works are outlined which the tenants have carried out, both internal and external. Under ‘Disrepair/Defects’, various items are listed similarly, which include a crack to the wall in the main bedroom and the kitchen cupboards have become displaced and showing signs of mould, for which corresponding photographs are provided.
12. Mrs [NAME] goes on to say there is no public transport within four miles, the property is up a farm drive, which is not maintained, and the bins have to be pushed/carried to the end of the drive for collection.
13. Mrs [NAME] does not give an assessment of the rental value but confirms that whereas the original tenancy agreement included water charges, these are now being paid for by the tenants. An invoice for a new carpet fitted in the sitting room dated 5 February 2024 is provided too. Determination and Valuation 14. After reviewing the rental values of the comparable lettings’ properties given by [NAME] [NAME] [NAME], and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the market rent for the property in good tenantable condition is £1,350 (One Thousand, Three Hundred and Fifty Pounds) Per Calendar Month.
15. Whereas at the commencement of the tenancy the landlord was responsible for the payment of the water charges, these are now being paid for by the tenants.
16. The tenants have carried out various works at the property which the Tribunal determines are the responsibility of the landlord. Similarly, the Tribunal determines the installation of a new wood-burner (as an integral part of the solid fuel central heating) in November 2022 is not an improvement, but a repair.
17. From the information and evidence given by the parties in their Statements, the property is in fair condition (the kitchen and bathroom equipment are dated and there are general wants of repair) and does not include all those features associated with a residential letting.
Accordingly, the Tribunal has concluded adjustments are required to the market rent.
18. The Tribunal’s valuation is shown below: Market rent in good condition (£ PCM)
£1,350 Less deductions (£ PCM) for: Tenants provision of White Goods
£30 Tenants provision of carpets and curtains £50 Dated kitchen equipment
£150 Dated bathroom equipment £100 General wants of repair £100 £430
HAV/40 UG/MNR/2025/0623 4 Market rent (per calendar month) £920 19. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under the terms of this assured agricultural occupancy tenancy was £920 (Nine Hundred and Twenty Pounds) Per Calendar Month.
20. Whereas as the tenants say they moved into the property as an agricultural workers’ tied cottage and now they pay for the water charges as an additional cost, they have made no representations that the proposed starting date for the new rent specified in the landlord’s notice would cause them undue hardship.
21.
Accordingly, the Tribunal directs that the new rent of £920 Per Calendar Month should take effect from 1 March 2025. This being the date specified in the landlord’s notice proposing a new rent.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £750 for Two-Bedroom Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £600 for Poorly Equipped Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Listed Farmhouse
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Two-Bedroom Flat
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should reflect the current condition of the property.
- The rent should be based on comparable properties in the area.
- The rent should consider the property's location.
- The rent should adjust for any improvements made by the tenant.
- The rent increase must comply with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the market rent for an agricultural tenancy at £920 per month.
Who was involved?
The dispute was between a tenant and a landlord over the rent for an agricultural tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal reviewed comparable lettings and adjusted the rent based on the property's condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and comparable lettings were crucial in determining the market rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and comparable rents in the area.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, descriptions of the property, and comparable lettings were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of receiving the summary reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
