VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Two-Bedroom Flat

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a two-bedroom flat in Basingstoke. The Tribunal reviewed comparable properties in the area and decided that the rent should be £1,150 per calendar month, effective from 21 February 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination based on comparable properties in the area.

Topics

rent determinationmarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on comparable properties in the area. However, applications cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a two-bedroom flat in Basingstoke.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a two-bedroom flat in Basingstoke based on comparable properties in the area. The Tribunal found that the rent should be £1,150 per calendar month, effective from 21 February 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0612

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988, Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [COMPANY] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Judge Gethin

Landlord [NAME] & [NAME] c/o [COMPANY], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE].

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £1150.00 Per Calendar Month (To exclude Water Rates and Council Tax but to include any amounts in paras. 3 and 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 February 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 January 2023

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies. The tenant is required to keep the interior of the property in repair, fair wear and tear excepted.

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord No.

8. Description of premises One of four flats in a modern two storey building of traditional brick construction and pitched tiled roof. No. 86 is on the ground floor with accommodation comprising: living room (with off-street entrance); hall; two bedrooms; kitchen (with off-street entrance); and bathroom/WC. Outside there is a private garden and an allocated parking space.

[NAME] of Decision 10 March 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0612 Property : [COMPANY], Basingstoke Hampshire [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlords : Mr [COUNSEL] and Mrs [COUNSEL] : [COMPANY] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent - sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] Judge D Gethin Date of Application : 17 January 2025 Date of Decision :

10 March 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,150 (One Thousand, One Hundred and Fifty Pounds) Per Calendar Month with effect from 21 February 2025.

HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0612 2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 7 January 2025 the Landlords’ Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,150 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,075 per month to take effect from 21 February 2025.

2. On 17 January 2025 under Section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlords’ notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. 4. [COMPANY] is one of four flats in a modern two storey building of brick construction and pitched tiled roof. No. 86 is on the ground floor with accommodation as follows: living room (with off-street entrance), hall, two bedrooms, kitchen (with off-street entrance) and bathroom/WC. Outside there is a private garden and an allocated parking space. Evidence

5. The Tribunal has considered the Rent Appeal Statement given by Ms [NAME] of [COMPANY] on behalf of the Landlords to the Tribunal and copied to the Tenant, dated 27 January 2025. In addition, the Tribunal has considered the Rent Appeal Statement given by the Tenant, Mr [APPELLANT], to the Tribunal and copied to the Landlords’ Agent, dated 17 February 2025. Both Statements were given in accordance with the Tribunal’s Directions, dated 24 January 2025.

6. With respect to the property, both parties in their Statements included: a floor plan; a selection of photographs; its features; and comment on its condition. The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the Tenancy agreement dated 21 January 2023.

7. To assist the Tribunal, both parties have provided comparable lettings’ properties to which to refer to reach its valuation.

8. On behalf of the Landlords, Ms [NAME] says ‘’Property was refurbished prior to tenancy commencement and occupation...’’ And goes on to say ‘’Exact age unknown – modern and in good condition.’’ Under ‘Features’, central heating, double glazing, carpets and curtains and white goods are provided by the Landlords. In addition, there is an allocated off-street parking space and a private garden.

9. Ms [NAME] has given nine (9) comparable lettings’ properties to which the Tribunal can refer to, each being a two-bedroom apartment in the Basingstoke,

HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0612 3 RG24 postcode. The range of rental values listed for the properties is from £1,150 per calendar month to £1,300 per calendar month.

10. In his Statement, Mr [NAME] confirms Ms [NAME] description of the property outlined at paragraph 7 above.

11. Mr [NAME] has given six (6) comparable lettings’ properties to which the Tribunal can refer to. One of which is a one-bedroom flat in Lychpit, available to let at a quoting rent of £950 per calendar month. Mr [NAME] says ‘’This property is similar to [COMPANY], although it only has 1 bedroom.’’ 12. Each of the other five properties is a two-bedroom flat or maisonette. The range of rental values listed for the properties is from £1,000 per calendar month to £1,050 per calendar month. Determination and Valuation 13. After reviewing the rental values of the comparable lettings’ properties given by the parties, and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the market rent for the property in good tenantable condition is £1,150 (One Thousand, One Hundred and Fifty Pounds) Per Calendar Month.

14. From the information and evidence given by the parties in their Statements, the property is in good tenantable condition and includes all those features associated with a residential letting.

Accordingly, the Tribunal has concluded that no adjustment is required to the market rent.

15. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,150 (One Thousand, One Hundred and Fifty Pounds) Per Calendar Month.

16. The Tenant has made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlords’ notice would cause him undue hardship.

17.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directs that the new rent of £1,150 Per Calendar Month should take effect from 21 February 2025. This being the date specified in the Landlords’ Notice proposing a new rent.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the specific conditions of their property under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant may refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
  • A tenant's rent under an assured periodic tenancy is set by considering both current market rates and the specific condition of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction due to ongoing property defects.
  • A tenant is entitled to a market rent for their property under an assured tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination based on comparable evidence and adjustments for their responsibilities.
  • A tenant is entitled to have the market rent for their assured periodic tenancy determined by the Tribunal.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the actual condition and amenities of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and local circumstances.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant is entitled to a market rent determination based on comparable properties in good condition within the same locality.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a two-bedroom flat in Basingstoke to be £1,150 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and landlords in Basingstoke.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable properties in the area, ensuring the rent reflects current market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent at £1,150 per calendar month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect the rent to be determined based on comparable properties in the area.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable properties in the area and the Tenancy Agreement were important evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.