First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £840 pcm
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £840 pcm for a tenant's flat in a mixed residential and retail development, taking into account comparable properties and local conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must be in a prescribed form and specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the open-market rent based on various factors including the periods of the tenancy, the terms of the tenancy, and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of the Act.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £840 pcm for a flat in a mixed residential and retail development.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a market rent of £840 pcm for a tenant's flat in a mixed residential and retail development, considering comparable properties and local conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case reference : CAM/00MG/MNR/2023/0004 HMCTS code : P:[NAME] : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant (Tenant) : [APPELLANT] Respondent (Landlord) : [APPELLANT] (agent for [RESPONDENT]) Type of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent: Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Determination : 23 March 2023
DECISION
This has been a remote determination on the papers which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. The form of determination was a paper hearing described above as P:PAPERREMOTE. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in bundles from the Applicant and the Respondent. The Tribunal has noted the contents and the decision is below.
Decision The Tribunal determined a market rent of £840 per calendar month effective from 11 January 2023.
Reasons Background
1. On 7 December 2022 the Landlord served notice under section 13 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 to increase the passing rent from £765 per calendar month (pcm) to £995 with effect from 11 January 2023.
2. This rent is stated to be exclusive of Council Tax, Water Charges and fixed service charges.
3. The Tenant made an [NAME] dated 28 December 2022 to the Tribunal in reliance on section 13 (4) of the Housing Act 1988.
4. The Tribunal issued directions on 9 January 2023, inviting the Parties to submit any further representations (including any photographs and details of rentals for similar properties) they wished the tribunal to consider.
5. Neither Party requested a hearing, and the matter has been determined on the papers.
The [NAME]
6. The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] on 20 February 2023 accompanied by the Tenant.
7. The [NAME] comprises a ground floor flat within a purpose-built two- storey apartment block constructed circa 2017. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen, bathroom and a bedroom.
8. It is located within a mixed residential and retail development. The Tribunal noted that the locality has not been well maintained and gives the impression of being allowed to deteriorate. In addition, the [NAME] is downwind from the nearby McDonalds.
9. There is central heating, and the [NAME] is fitted commensurate with its age. The [NAME] also benefits from double glazing together with an allocated parking space but there is no open amenity space.
10. The Tribunal notes that the EPC banding is B and that the stated assumed floor area is 54 sqm.
11. The Council banding is A. The Tenancy
12. The Tenant occupied the [NAME] by virtue of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that commenced 11 April 2019 and expired on 10 April 2020.
13. The rent under this Tenancy was £750 pcm.
14. The Landlord covenanted to comply with section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as further set out below in respect of repairs. The lease is silent in respect of the maintenance of the wider development and general locality by the Landlord.
15. In the absence of a new Tenancy being entered into, an Assured Periodic Tenancy pursuant to Section 5 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act) has arisen such that Sections 13 and 14 of the Act now apply. The Law 16. Section 5 (3) of the Act provides that the periodic tenancy arising on expiry of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy is one: “(a) taking effect in possession immediately on the coming to an end of the fixed term tenancy; (b) deemed to have been granted by the [NAME] under the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end to the [NAME] under that tenancy; (c) under which the premises which are let are the same dwelling-house as was let under the fixed term tenancy; (d) under which the periods of the tenancy are the same as those for which rent was last payable under the fixed term tenancy; and (e) under which, subject to the following provisions of this Part of this Act, the other terms are the same as those of the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end, except that any term which makes provision for determination by the landlord or the tenant shall not have effect while the tenancy remains an assured tenancy” 17. Section 14 of the 1988 Act provides that the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: a. “having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; b. which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; c. the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the existing tenancy.” 18. Section 14 (2) of the 1988 Act requires the Tribunal to disregard:
a. “Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; b. Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14 (3) of the Act) otherwise than as an obligation; c. Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.” 19. Examples of a tenant’s failure to comply with the terms of the lease may include, for example, a lack of redecoration.
20. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the 1985 Act), provides that the Tribunal is to imply a covenant by the Landlord: a. “to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling- house (including drains, gutters and external pipes), b. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences, but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for [NAME] use of the supply of water, gas or electricity), and c. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for space heating and heating water.” 21. Section 14 (7) of the 1988 Act states: “Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.”
Representations – The Tenant 22. The Tenant raised the following points: Whether the Landlord provided sufficient notice The high level of the proposed rent compared to similar properties.
23. The Tenant provided details of three comparable properties for consideration by the Tribunal. 24. [NAME] 1 comprised a one bedroom flat located on the 4th floor of the nearby high rise development known as [NAME]. This has similar accommodation to the [NAME] but also benefitted from a Juliet balcony, views over the canal and communal gardens. This [NAME] was advertised at £875 pcm. 25. [NAME] 2 comprised a one bedroom flat understood to be next-door to the [NAME]. This was advertised at £850 pcm. 26. [NAME] 3 comprised a two bedroom flat within the same development as the [NAME] but located to the north overlooking the canal. This was advertised at £975 pcm. Representations – The Landlord 27. No submissions have been received from the Landlord or their agents. Determination 28. In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant. The current rent and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant.
29. The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have any regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.
30. The [NAME] is well maintained and has been kept in an excellent state of repair and decoration such that it would present well for letting.
31. The Tribunal has reviewed the evidence provided by the Tenant and has also reviewed current asking rents of properties within the Triangle and the Londsdale development.
32. It is apparent that the Lonsdale development is more attractive than the Triangle and this is reflected in the values being achieved. In this regard, it appears that the Landlord has valued the [NAME] as if it was located within, and had the benefits of, the Lonsdale scheme.
33. In this regard, the Landlord’s requested rent might be appropriate for a two bedroom upper floor flat within [NAME] benefitting from a balcony, river views and amenities. However, the [NAME] is a one bedroom ground floor flat directly facing a tired retail parade within a less attractive development and no amenities other than a single car parking space.
34. The Tribunal prefers the letting evidence of similar properties within the Triangle development and places little weight on rentals achieved within the Lonsdale development.
35. Having had regard to all the available evidence, the Tribunal determines the market rental of the [NAME] to be £840 pcm. The rent payable may not, therefore, exceed this figure. However, this does not prevent the Landlord from charging a lower figure.
36. The revised rent is to be to be effective from 11 January 2023.
37. The Tribunal makes no order in respect as to whether the Landlord provided sufficient notice.
Name: [RESPONDENT] [NAME]: 23 March 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. CAM/00MG/MNR/2023/0004
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] (agent for [RESPONDENT]) [COMPANY] 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 840 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 11 January 2023
3. The amount included for services is
not applicable Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 10 April 2020 5. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant liable for internal repairs 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A 9. Description of premises The [NAME] comprises a ground floor flat within a purpose-built two-storey apartment block constructed circa 2017. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen, bathroom and a bedroom. There is an allocated parking space but no amenity or open space
Chairman P [NAME] of Decision 23 March 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,000 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,150 Per Month by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £945 per Month by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £750 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,500 Per Month by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £900 Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,050 Per Month for Flat in Reading
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £930 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Oxfordshire Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,950 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a market rent determination under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The market rent is determined based on prevailing levels of rent in the general locality.
- The market rent is assessed based on comparable properties in the area.
- The market rent takes into account the actual condition of the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for the tenant's flat was set at £840 pcm.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the evidence of comparable properties and local conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant argued that the proposed rent was too high compared to similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable properties and local conditions when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of comparable properties and local conditions mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
