VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £930 per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for a property in Harlow at £930 per month, effective from February 16, 2023. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988, considering a person's condition and local rental prices.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

Market Rent DeterminationAssured Shorthold Tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy, which must begin at least two months after the date of the notice's service.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £930 per month for a property in Harlow, effective from 16 February 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £930 per month for a property in Harlow, effective from 16 February 2023, under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision was based on the condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/22UJ/MNR/2023/0015 HMCTS code : P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 90 Kingsland, Harlow, [POSTCODE] Applicant (Tenant) : [APPELLANT] Respondent (Landlord) : [APPELLANT] of application : Determination of a Market Rent: Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Determination : 27 April 2023

DECISION

This has been a remote determination on the papers which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. The form of determination was a paper hearing described above as P:PAPERREMOTE. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in bundles from the Applicant and the Respondent. The Tribunal has noted the contents and the decision is below.

Decision The Tribunal determined a market rent of £930 per calendar month effective from 16 February 2023.

Reasons Background

1. On 13 January 2023 the Landlord served notice under section 13 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 to increase the passing rent from £850 per calendar month (pcm) to £950 pcm with effect from 16 February 2023.

2. This rent is stated to be exclusive of Council Tax, Water Charges and fixed service charges.

3. The Tenant made an application dated 12 January 2023 to the Tribunal in reliance on section 13 (4) of the Housing Act 1988. This was acknowledged by the Tribunal on 1 February 2023.

4. The Tribunal issued directions on 31 January 2023, inviting the Parties to submit any further representations (including any photographs and details of rentals for similar properties) they wished the Tribunal to consider.

5. The Landlord submitted a Reply Form on 14 February 2023.

6. The Tenant submitted a Reply Form dated 3 February 2023 but this was received by the Tribunal on 3 March 2023.

7. Neither Party requested a hearing, and the matter has been determined on the papers.

[NAME]

8. The Tribunal inspected [NAME] on 3 April 2023 accompanied by the Tenant. Whilst Mr [APPELLANT] attended on behalf of the Landlord, he was denied access by the Tenant, but it was agreed by the Parties that the Tribunal’s inspection should proceed. 9. [NAME] comprises a first floor flat within a purpose-built former council owned apartment block constructed in the 1960/70s.

10. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms. There is off-street car parking.

11. There is central heating and UPVC double glazing.

12. The Tribunal notes that the EPC banding is D and that the stated assumed floor area is 60 sqm.

13. The Council Tax Band is B. The Tenancy 14. The Tenant occupied [NAME] by virtue of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy dated 13 June 2017 for a period of 6 months commencing on 16 June 2017.

15. The rent under this Tenancy was £850 pcm. 16. [NAME] is defined as “90 Kingsland Harlow Essex [POSTCODE]” and the contents are defined as “The fixtures and fittings at [NAME] together with any furniture, carpets and other effects listed in the Inventory.” The Tribunal has not been provided with an Inventory.

17. The Tenant’s repair obligations are set out at clause 3 of the lease whilst the Landlord is required to comply with section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as further set out below.

18. In the absence of a new Tenancy being entered into, an Assured Periodic Tenancy pursuant to Section 5 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act) has arisen such that Sections 13 and 14 of the Act now apply. The Law 19. Section 5 (3) of the Act provides that the periodic tenancy arising on expiry of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy is one: “(a) taking effect in possession immediately on the coming to an end of the fixed term tenancy; (b) deemed to have been granted by the [NAME] under the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end to the [NAME] under that tenancy; (c) under which the premises which are let are the same dwelling- house as was let under the fixed term tenancy; (d) under which the periods of the tenancy are the same as those for which rent was last payable under the fixed term tenancy; and (e) under which, subject to the following provisions of this Part of this Act, the other terms are the same as those of the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end, except that any term which makes provision for determination by the landlord or the tenant shall not have effect while the tenancy remains an assured tenancy” 20. Section 14 of the 1988 Act provides that the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which [NAME] might reasonably be expected

to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: a. “having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; b. which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; c. the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the existing tenancy.” 21. Section 14 (2) of the 1988 Act requires the Tribunal to disregard: a. “Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; b. Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14 (3) of the Act) otherwise than as an obligation; c. Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.” 22. Examples of a tenant’s failure to comply with the terms of the lease may include, for example, a lack of redecoration.

23. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the 1985 Act), provides that the Tribunal is to imply a covenant by the Landlord: a. “to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling- house (including drains, gutters and external pipes), b. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences, but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for making use of the supply of water, gas or electricity), and c. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for space heating and heating water.” 24. Section 14 (7) of the 1988 Act states: “Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate

tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.” Representations – The Tenant 25. The Tenant attached detailed representations to the Reply dated 3 February 2023. The Tribunal has summarised the main points in respect of issues with [NAME] below. a. Ongoing issues with mould since 2017 b. No extractor fans in [NAME] apart from the monoxide fan in the lounge c. Broken front door d. Lack of external storage space e. Broken plug in the kitchen f. Damaged bath g. Damaged heater h. Broken fridge i. The existence of damp j. Leaking windows k. Water leak in kitchen 26. The Tenant also provided a list of improvements made to [NAME] and set out comments distinguishing the condition of [NAME] relative to other properties available for letting. Representations – The Landlord 27. Mr [RESPONDENT] provided details of comparable properties upon which the proposed rent was based.

28. He also set out a number of additional points in respect of the history of discussions between the Landlord and Tenant. Determination 29. In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant. The current rent and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant.

30. The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have any regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.

31. Having reviewed the comparbale particulars provided by Mr [NAME] it is apparent that they have been fitted out to a modern standard and are in a superior condition relative to [NAME]. As such, whilst these comparables are helpful in assessing the market rent of [NAME] in the event that it has been refurbished, an adjustment is required to account for the relative lack of modernisation.

32. In this regard, [NAME] has been occupied by the current tenant since 2017 and it is apparent from the inspection that it would benefit from refurbishment and modernisation in order to bring it back up to market standards.

33. There would be particular benefit in fitting effective mechanical ventilation to the bathroom and kitchen areas to extract warm damp air thereby assisting with the control of condensation and mould.

34. It is notable that the rents referred to by Mr [NAME] range from £995 per month to £1,150 per month but the Landlord has quoted £950 per month. It is therefore apparent that, notwithstanding the apparent differences in opinion as to the historic work undertaken at [NAME], the Landlord recognises that [NAME] as it currently exists would not achieve a rent directly comparable to other properties in the market.

35. On balance, the Tribunal is of the opinion that, on the assumption that the Tenant had fully complied with their lease obligations in respect of the maintenance of [NAME], sufficient disrepair and obsolescence would remain such that a discount from the rents being quoted in the market is warranted.

36. It is therefore the Tribunal’s opinion that the current market rental value of [NAME] as it actually exists and on the assumption that the Tenant had complied with their covenants would be £930 per month.

37. The Tribunal directs that the revised rent is to be effective from 16 February 2023.

Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 27 April 2023

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/22UJ/MNR/2023/0015

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 90 Kingsland, Harlow, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] C/O [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 4-6 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 930 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 16 February 2023

3. The amount included for services is

not applicable Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 16 June 2017

5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant liable for internal repairs

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord This has been disregarded

9. Description of premises [NAME] comprises a first floor flat within a purpose-built former council owned apartment block constructed in the 1960/70s. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms.

Chairman P [NAME] of Decision 27 April 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a market rent of £930 per calendar month.
  • The Tribunal considered comparable properties provided by the landlord, but adjusted for the subject property's lack of modernisation.
  • The property would benefit from refurbishment and modernisation to meet market standards.
  • Fitting mechanical ventilation in the bathroom and kitchen would help control condensation and mould.
  • The landlord's proposed rent of £950 per month indicated recognition that the property would not achieve rents directly comparable to others.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The market rent for a property in Harlow was set at £930 per month, effective from February 16, 2023.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the market rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and its comparison to similar properties in the area were crucial arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the condition of the property and comparable rental values.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving market rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.