First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £1,600 per month for a property in Watford. The decision was based on rental values of similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to a market rent for a property based on comparable local rental values.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent at which the dwelling-house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies and outlines the process for landlords to propose increases in rent. It specifies the form of notice, the timing of when the new rent can take effect, and the conditions under which these increases can occur.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property based on comparable local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,600 per calendar month for a property located at 8 Cow Lane, Watford, based on comparable local rental values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/26UK/MNR/2022/0052 HMCTS code : P:PAPERREMOTE Property : 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant (Tenant) : [APPELLANT] [NAME] Respondent (Landlord) : [APPELLANT] [RESPONDENT] of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent: Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Determination : 26 August 2022
DECISION
This has been a remote determination on the papers which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. The form of determination was a paper hearing described above as P:PAPERREMOTE. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in bundles from the Applicant and the Respondent. The Tribunal has noted the contents and the decision is below.
2 Decision The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,600 per calendar month effective from 28 June 2022.
Reasons Background
1. On 17 May 2022 the Landlord served notice under section 13 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 to increase the passing rent from £1,450 per month to £1,600 with effect from 28 June 2022.
2. This rent is stated to be exclusive of Council Tax, Water Charges and fixed service charges.
3. The Tenant made an undated [NAME] to the Tribunal in reliance on section 13 (4) of the Housing Act 1988.
4. The Tribunal issued directions on 16 June 2022, inviting the Parties to submit any further representations (including any photographs and details of rentals for similar properties) they wished the tribunal to consider.
5. Neither Party requested a hearing.
The Property 6. The Tribunal has not inspected the Property and has relied upon the papers provided by the Parties together with Google Images and Rightmove historic sales particulars.
7. The Tenant has described the Property as being detached. However, it is apparent from both Google Images and the Sales Particulars dated September 2016, that it is a mid-terraced property constructed of brick and tile.
8. The Tribunal understands from these sources that the accommodation comprises a lounge and kitchen/dining room on the ground floor with three bedrooms, a bathroom and ensuite on the first floor.
9. According to the Sales Particulars, the property was constructed in November 2010 to a high standard and includes a fully fitted kitchen and bathroom together with white goods.
10. There is small garden to the front and a larger garden to the rear behind which is located two car off-road car parking spaces.
11. The Tribunal understands that all carpets, curtains and white goods belong to the Landlord.
3 12. The Tribunal notes that the EPC banding is C effective from 24 October 2020 and that the assumed floor area extends to 77 square metres.
13. The Tribunal also notes that the Property has been placed in Council Tax D. The Tenancy 14. The Tenant occupied the Property by virtue of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that commenced 29 September 2019 and expired on 27 September 2020.
15. The initial rent under the Tenancy was £1,450 per month.
16. The Tenant was required to “…take reasonable steps to keep the interior of the Property and the Fixtures and Fittings in the same decorative order and condition throughout the Term as at the start of the Tenancy, as noted in the Inventory and Schedule of Condition. The Tenant is not responsible for fair wear and tear, any damage caused by fire… …repairs for which the Landlord has responsibility… …damage covered by the Landlord’s insurance policy.” 17. The Landlord was required to “…comply with the obligations to repair the Property as set out in sections 11 to 16 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended by the Housing Act 1988)…” 18. In the absence of a new Tenancy being entered into, an Assured Periodic Tenancy has arisen such that Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 now apply. The Law 19. Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act) provides that the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the Property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: a. “having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; b. which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; c. the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the existing tenancy.” 20. Section 14 (2) of the Act requires the Tribunal to disregard a. “Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
4 b. Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14 (3) of the Act) otherwise than as an obligation; c. Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.” 21. Examples of a tenant’s failure to comply with the terms of the lease may include, for example, a lack of redecoration.
22. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the 1985 Act), provides that the Tribunal is to imply a covenant by the Landlord: a. “to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling- house (including drains, gutters and external pipes), b. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences, but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for [NAME] use of the supply of water, gas or electricity), and c. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for space heating and heating water.” 23. Section 14 (7) of the 1988 Act states: “Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.” Representations – The Tenant 24. The Tenant submitted various scanned documents and photographs. Unfortunately, these were not legible and, despite chasing by the Tribunal, no further copies have been submitted.
25. They appear to refer to the state of repair of the Property. However, as set out above, it is assumed that the Parties have complied with their covenants. Representations – The Landlord 26. The Landlord has not made any representations.
5 Determination 27. In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant. The current rent and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant.
28. The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.
29. As neither the Tenant nor the Landlord have submitted any evidence of value, it has been incumbent upon the Tribunal to make independent investigations.
30. There is currently only one property on the market within a half mile radius of the Property that is not a flat or maisonette. This comprises a modernised and furnished semi-detached property on [ADDRESS] which provides a reception room, kitchen/dining room and conservatory on the ground floor and three bedrooms together with a family bathroom on the first floor. There is a garden laid to grass at the rear and a driveway but no garage. This is currently available to let at £1,950 pm.
31. Further afield, a modernised 5 bed semi-detached property on [ADDRESS] is being advertised at £2,800 pm, a 3-bed semi-detached house on Ganders Ash is advertised at £1,650 pm and a 3-bed semi-detached house in [ADDRESS] is available at £1,600 pm.
32. All these properties differ in respect of their locality, age, configuration and fit out. However, they are of assistance in setting a general level of value.
33. The Tribunal therefore determines the market rental of the Property with effect from 28 June 2022 at £1,600 per calendar month. The rent payable may not, therefore, exceed this figure. However, this does not prevent the Landlord from charging a lower figure.
Name: [RESPONDENT] [NAME]: 26 August 2022
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
6 If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Oxfordshire Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord's Rent Increase Notice Invalid Due to Missing Service Date
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,425 per Month by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Acquires Freehold in Missing Landlord Case
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Price for Slough Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £840 pcm
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £900 Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £930 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The case involves a request for a market rent determination under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The claim involves a tenant's entitlement to a market rent based on comparable local rental values.
- The claim includes a tenant's right to acquire the freehold interest of their property according to relevant acts.
- The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine the market rent for a fixed-term tenancy under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The claim involves a landlord's entitlement to propose a market rent without providing a valid notice of rent increase.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a market rent of £1,600 per month for a property in Watford.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable rental values of similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of rental values of similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable rental values when determining a market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included rental values of similar properties in the area.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
