VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set the market rent at £1700.00 per month for a flat in London, considering factors like property condition and amenities when adjusting from the landlord's proposed amount of £1575.00.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may adjust the proposed rent based on the actual condition of the premises, including issues like vermin infestation and defective ventilation.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy, considering the same terms and conditions, excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on evidence of property condition and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1700.00 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting the proposed amount based on evidence of property condition and amenities including vermin infestation and defective ventilation.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AC/MNR/2023/0336

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 213A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1700.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 July 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable 0.00 Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 30 June 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per agreement s11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None listed

9. Description of premises 6th floor flat 1 reception room 2 bedrooms 2 bathrooms

[NAME] of Decision 23 October 2023c

1

Case Reference

: TR/LON/00AC/MNR/2023/0336

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 26 July 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 23 October 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1700.00 per calendar month with effect from 30 July 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 30 June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1700.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 1575.00 per month to take effect from 30 July 2023.

2. On 26 July 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 26 July 2023.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The directions provided that written evidence from the landlord was to be submitted by 11 September 2023 and a reply from the tenant by 25 September. Late evidence from the landlord was sent to the tribunal at 19.33 on 17 October 2023 without explanation. Late evidence was received by the tribunal from the tenant at 17.25 on 16 October 2023 with an explanation this was due to illness and awaiting receipt of documents from the Local Authority.

5. The tenants documents included an improvement notice dated 3 October which the tribunal considered to be relevant to the level of rent and the tribunal therefore admits both party’s late documents.

6. The improvement notice identified a category 2 hazard of defective ventilation in both bathrooms and kitchen leading to excessive mould in the flat

Determination and Valuation

7. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £2000.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. [APPELLANT] infestation b. Tenant supplying a washing machine c. The improvement notice

3 8. The full valuation is shown below:

Decision

9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1700.00 per calendar month.

10. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1700.00 to take effect on 30 July 2023, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: [NAME]: 23 October 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

PCM AST Market rent 2,000.00 £ less condition 15.0% 300.00 -£ 1,700.00 £

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on the condition of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • A landlord can adjust the rent based on the condition of the property and local market conditions.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition and amenities of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a market rate as determined by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at the open market rate as determined by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent at £1700 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in determining the market rent for a flat.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered evidence of property condition and amenities to adjust from the proposed rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was used to determine the market rent.

What argument mattered most?

Evidence showing issues like vermin infestation and defective ventilation in the flat influenced the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The tenant's proposed rent adjustment was partially accepted, setting a higher rent than initially proposed but lower than the landlord's request.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can argue that property condition should affect the market rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Improvement notices and written evidence from both parties were crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions of this nature may be appealable to higher courts under certain conditions.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.