First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Studio Flat
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a studio flat in London. They considered the condition of the flat and compared it to similar properties in the area. The rent was set at £850 per month, starting from September 16, 2020.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the open market value of their accommodation.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a studio flat in London.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a studio flat in London, considering various factors including the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area. The rent was set at £850 per month, effective from 16 September 2020.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT], 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 850.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 16 September 2020
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 16 September 2019
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord -
9. Description of premises Studio flat with shared kitchen on first floor of converted house.
Chairman E [NAME] of Decision 21 December 2020
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/MNR/2020/0122
Case Reference : LON/00AY/MNR/2020/0122
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 21 August 2020
Type of [NAME] : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 21 December 2020 Determination
remote hearing on the papers.
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The market rent as at 16 September 2020 is £850 per month.
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE, a paper determination which is not provisional. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in an electronic bundle, the contents of which I have recorded.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 12 August 2020 the tenant of the above flat referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2. The landlord's notice, which proposed a rent of £1146.86 with effect from 16 September 2020, is dated 31 July 2020.
3. The tenancy is a periodic tenancy which commenced 16 September 2019.
4. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the [NAME] being dealt with on the papers. Both parties confirmed that they were content for the matter to be dealt with on the papers. The Tribunal received written representations from both the landlord and the tenant.
The Evidence
5. The landlord stated that the proposed rent was based on the Local Housing Allowance for a one bedroom flat in Inner South East London which is set by the Valuation Office Agency. In support of the proposed rent the landlord referred to all the other rents on 2A and [ADDRESS]: of the nine other units one was let at a higher rent because it is occupied by a mother and baby, seven are let at the proposed rent and one at a lower figure because it has not yet been reviewed. The flats are let under a scheme operated by the local authority for those in danger of becoming homeless. The subject flat is the 3rd most spacious flat in the house which has been converted into ten units.
6. The tenant described his accommodation as being one room with kitchenette area and a bathroom/wc. He shares a kitchen with cooker, sink, fridge freezer and cupboard with the other tenant on the first floor. There is also a cash metered washer/dryer in the kitchen. Heating is via an electric heater, the windows are single glazed; there is no entryphone, just a doorbell by the front door to the house. The landlord has provided the laminate flooring, blinds and white goods. There is no off-street parking and the garden is so overgrown as not to be usable.
7. The tenant stated that he obtained the tenancy agreement under a scheme to assist those in danger of becoming homeless and that initially the rent was based on the Local Housing Allowance however after 12 months the tenancy was a normal tenancy with the rent being based on the market rent.
8. He referred to other flats on the market within a little over 2 miles from his flat where the rents ranged from £750 per month, to £900 per month.
[ADDRESS], a few hundred yards from the subject, a studio flat, of a
similar size, is available at an asking rent of £760 per month including council
tax and heating.
[ADDRESS], the same road as the subject, a much larger studio is
available for £995 per month.
[ADDRESS], within half a mile of the subject, a one bedroom flat is
available for £800 per month.
[ADDRESS], within a few hundred yards of the subject, A studio flat, larger
with full kitchen, eaves storage and modernised, is available for £995 per
month.
SE21 and SW2 studio flats available at £900 per month
SW2 a larger studio is available for £750 per month.
None of the comparables include shared facilities.
Hardship
9. The tenant provided details of his disposable income and asked that the Tribunal take this into account when determining the start date for the revised rent since backdating an increase would result in hardship.
The law
10. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
11. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
Valuation
12. In coming to its decision, the Tribunal had regard to the comparable evidence supplied by the parties. The Tribunal does not find the landlord’s comparables helpful in determining the open market rent because there has been no testing of the market, the rent is simply the amount of the Local Housing Allowance for a one bedroom flat. The actual flats are however, not one bedroomed but studios with shared cooking facilities. The flat is within close proximity of all local facilities and transport.
13. In determining the rental value of the subject property, the Tribunal has taken into account all the factors in respect of lack of proper kitchen facilities within the flat itself, the single glazed windows and the size of the studio which is at the smaller end of those available on the open market.
The decision
14. The Tribunal concluded that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market is £850 per month. The rent will take effect
from 16 September 2020 in accordance with the landlord’s notice. The Tribunal determines that backdating of the new rent will not cause hardship because it is less than the rent paid prior to that date,
Chairman: [NAME]: 21 December 2020
__________________________________
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
iii. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;
(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d )in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not
those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling- house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared Room Including Bills
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for One-Bedroom Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent reflecting the open market value of their accommodation.
- The rent is determined under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.
- The rent is based on the actual characteristics of the property, not misrepresentations.
- The rent is determined by the Tribunal based on the open market value of similar properties.
- The market conditions and quality of accommodation are considered in determining the rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The case does not specify a clear outcome related to the tenant's entitlement to market-based rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for a studio flat was set at £850 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, considering factors like the condition of the flat and comparable rents.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the flat's condition and rent with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set lower than what the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the open market value of their property when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the flat's condition and comparable rents in the area were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
