VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a two-bedroom flat under an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £145.00 per week, starting from April 1, 2024, after considering the property's value and market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the open market value of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property under a periodic assured tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for a two-bedroom flat in a residential area.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for a two-bedroom flat under an assured periodic tenancy, setting the rent at £145.00 per week, effective from April 1, 2024, based on market conditions and property value.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2024/0047

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]. [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]. [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [ADDRESS], Birmingham, [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £145.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable £27.26 Per Week

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 April 2007

5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises First Floor Two [NAME] of Decision 20 May 2024

1

Case Reference : BIR/00CN/MNR/2024/0047

Property

: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent

: [redacted] : Appeal against a Notice proposing a new rent under an

Assured Periodic Tenancy under section 13(4) of the Housing

Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME].D. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS

D. [NAME]

[NAME] and Venue of : N/A. Paper determination. Hearing

Date of Decision : 20 May 2024

____________________________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

1 The rent is determined at £145.00 (One Hundred ad Forty Five Pounds) per week with effect from 1 April 2024.

REASONS

Introduction

2 The tenant, [APPELLANT], has held a tenancy of the subject property since 23 April 2007 and remains a statutory periodic, weekly assured shorthold tenant.

3 On 24 February 2024 the landlord served notice of increase under section 13(2) of The Housing Act 1988 proposing a rent increase from £134.10 per week to £145.36 per week to include a fixed service charge of £27.26 per week from 1 April 2024. The rent did not include Council Tax or water charges.

4 The tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine the rent.

5 The Tribunal issued Directions on 13 March 2024 and subsequently determined the rent on 20 May 2024 under section 14 of The Housing Act 1988, at £145.00 per week.

6 On 4 June 2024 the Tribunal received a request for Reasons from [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] who was assumed to be the tenant or a party acting on behalf of the tenant, as the Application indicated the tenant to be [APPELLANT]. The Reasons for the Tribunal's Decision are set out below.

The Law

7 Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 ('the Act') states:

'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to

which the notice relates;

(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;

(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as

those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'

'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;

(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant

improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the

tenant, if the improvement-

(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the

immediate landlord ...

8 The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 1 July 2013.

3

Facts Found

9 The Tribunal did not inspect the property and reached its Decision based on the tenant's submission and views of [ADDRESS] on Google Streetview.

10 The property is a first floor two bedroom flat in a converted house, located in a residential road of similar properties. The building dates from before 1920. It is of solid brick construction with a pitched roof. The flat has double glazed windows and central heating.

11 The accommodation comprises a hall, living room, kitchen, two bedrooms and bathroom.

Submissions

12 The Applicant's Submission

Mr [APPELLANT] submitted various papers evidencing a history of problems relating to the repair of the property going back to 2016. The documents included photographs and copies of correspondence from the landlord detailing rent arrears and other estate management issues. The papers also included a copy bill from [NAME] detailing overdue water rates of £3,081.41 on 16 October 2023.

13 Mr [APPELLANT] advised that he had fitted tiling and a laminate floor covering.

14 The Respondent's Submission

No submissions were received from the landlord, [NAME].

Decision

15 Neither party requested a Hearing and the Decision was reached on the submitted papers.

16 The tenant had produced papers showing there had been maintenance issues over several years but as the local authority had not issued an Improvement Notice, Closure Notice or Management Order, the accommodation was assumed to be satisfactory and habitable although the Tribunal noted the tenant's comments.

17 The Tribunal had been provided with a schedule detailing the service charge items which included communal cleaning, electricity for communal areas, door entry systems, grounds maintenance, tree maintenance, emergency lighting, a tv aerial, fire testing, a Ranger and management charge which came to £27.26 per week. However, as a fixed charge it is part of the overall weekly rent and any comparison with market rents would assume these services to be provided by other landlords without separate charge. The Tribunal therefore had to determine the weekly rent of the flat assuming these services were provided within the rent.

18 The Tribunal dd not find the tenant's tiling or laminate floor to have had a material effect on the rental value.

19 Neither party had provided any evidence of rents of other flats in the area and the Tribunal reached its decision based on its professional expertise and general knowledge. Bearing in mind the location, condition of the property and general levels of market rents, the Tribunal considered the rent based on the definition in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to have been £145.00 (One Hundred and Forty Five Pounds) per week including a service charge element of £27.26 per week, at the effective date of the Notice, 1 April 2024.

4

[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS

Chairman

Appeal

In accordance with section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and rule 21 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2010, the Tenant / respondent may make further application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) on a point of law only. Such application must be made in writing and received by the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) no later than 28 days after the date on which the First-tier Tribunal sent notice of this refusal to the party applying for permission to appeal. Where possible, you should send your further application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL], as this will enable the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) to deal with it more efficiently.

Alternatively, the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) may be contacted at: 5th [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (tel: [PHONE]).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent based on its professional expertise and general knowledge of market rents.
  • The property's location and condition were considered when determining the appropriate rent.
  • The service charge was included as part of the overall weekly rent for comparison with market rents.
  • The accommodation was assumed to be satisfactory and habitable since no local authority notices were issued.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for a two-bedroom flat was set at £145.00 per week, effective from April 1, 2024.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's value and market conditions, ensuring the rent reflects what a willing landlord could expect in the open market.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the fair market value of the property and the reasonable expectation of rent for a willing landlord.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination based on market conditions and property value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as property details, market conditions, and previous rent history were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.