First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1,950 per month based on the current market value of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determined by the open market value of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar periodic tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value of the property in Wembley Park.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0684
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1950 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 November 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 June 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Periodic Tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A first floor flat forming part of a multi storey block Accommodation comprises 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, en- suite shower room.
[NAME] of Decision 11 February 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0684
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 11 December 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 11 February 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,950 per calendar month with effect from 1 November 2024. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background
1. On the 25 June 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,711 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,564 per month to take effect from 18 August 2024. This proposed rental increase in based upon the Government’s maximum percentage increase and this matter is considered at paragraph 9 of these reasons.
2. The Tenant’s application is dated 11 December 2024 and served under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. This date was inserted on the application following communication from the Tribunal and it is to be assumed the undated application was received by the Tribunal before the 1 November 2025, being the proposed date of increase by the Landlord.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal received submissions from the Tenant which have been carefully considered.
Determination and Valuation
5. Firstly, having consideration of the parties’ comparable evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Dalston area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £1,950 per month.
6. The Tribunal have not made an adjustment in relation to condition of the property. In the Reply Form, the Tenant states there is no central heating. However, the EPC Rating for the property is B86 which is above average and confirms there is a community heating and hot water system.
Decision
7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £1,950 per calendar month.
8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,950 to take effect on the 1 November 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
3 9. It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination.
[NAME] 11 February 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0684
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 11 December 2024
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Extended Reasons
: 17 February 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
2
REASONS
Background
1. On the 13 February 2025, the Tribunal received a request from the Tenant for extended reasons following a decision on the 11 February 2025.
2. On the 25 June 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,711 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,564 per month to take effect from 1 November 2024. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the Tenants Fact Sheet dated 4 May 2021. A tenancy agreement was not submitted.
2. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. This Application was dated 11 December 2024. This date was inserted on the application following communications from the Tribunal and it is to be assumed that the original undated application was received by the Tribunal before the 1 November 2024, being the proposed date of increase by the Landlord.
Inspection and Hearing
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers in accordance with the Tenant’s wishes.
Evidence
4. Directions for the case were prepared by the Tribunal on the 19 December 2024. The Tenant’s provided the Tribunal with completed Reply Form. The Landlord did not engage with the process and neither party submitted comparable evidence for the letting of flats in the area.
5. The property is a purpose built first floor flat forming part of a multi storey block located in [ADDRESS]. The accommodation comprises: two bedrooms, living room/kitchen and bathroom/WC and en-suite shower room. In the reply form the Tenant’s state there is no central heating. However, the EPC Rating for the property is B86 which is above average and confirms that there is a community heating and hot water system. The Tenant’s state that they provided floor coverings and curtains and white goods were provided by the Landlord at the commencement of the tenancy.
The Law 6. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a
3 willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, partial exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration and rainwater fittings.
Determination and Valuation
7. Having consideration of the Tribunal’s expert general knowledge of rental values in the [ADDRESS] area. The Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £2,100 per month.
8. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: no carpets and curtains which equates to approximately £150 per month It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
Decision
9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,950 per calendar month.
10. Therefore, the Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,950 per month to take effect on the 1 November 2025. This, being the date of the Landlord’s Notice.
11 It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination.
Chairman: [NAME]: 17 February 2025
4
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Refurbished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property has visible deficiencies.
- Rent should reflect the fair market value.
- Tenant's financial circumstances are considered.
- Rent is adjusted based on property condition.
- Rent determination is made by the First-tier Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, considering comparable evidence and the property's condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's value to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a higher rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect the rent to be set based on the open market value of the property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence of rental values in the area and the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
