First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair market rent for a rented property, taking into account the property's condition and local rental prices. The rent was set at £1,800 per month, starting from January 1, 2025.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination based on the property's condition and local rental values.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and local rental values.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on the condition and location.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and local rental values. The rent was set at £1,800 per calendar month, effective from January 1, 2025.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0505
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 12A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr. [RESPONDENT]. [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [APPELLANT] 12 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME], Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1,800 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 January 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 October 2018
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11, Landlord and Tenant Act, 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Partly furnished – including beds, white goods, floor coverings.
9. Description of premises Three storey maisonette containing three bedrooms, lounge, kitchen and bathroom.
[NAME] of Decision 17 January 2025
Case Reference
: LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0505
Property : 12A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenants
: Ms [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord : Mr. [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 24th July 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr. [NAME]
Mr. [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 17th January 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,800 per calendar month with effect from 1st January 2025. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
SUMMARY REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 24 April 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,000 in place of the existing rent which the Landlord states to be £1,800 per calendar month (but the tenant contends to be £1,500 per calendar month) to take effect from 01 August 2024.
2. On 24 July 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 24 July 2024.
3. Directions were issued on 26 September 2024 by the Tribunal.
4. The parties were invited to submit any relevant information and submissions. The Tenant and the Landlord each submitted a reply form and additional evidence to support their respective case.
5. In their reply form, the Tenant had indicated that they wished a hearing be held in this matter. Accordingly, a face-to-face hearing was held in this matter on 7 January 2025 at 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE].
6. In their reply form the Tenant requested that the property be inspected. Accordingly the property was inspected by the Tribunal on 7 January 2027.
Evidence
7. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation
8. Having consideration of the evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,000 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
The current condition of the property including internal décor fixtures, fittings and floor coverings.
9. The valuation is shown below:
per calendar month
Market Rent
£2,000
Less Dated internal decoration, fixtures, fittings and floor coverings Approx.10 %
£200
£1,800
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,800 per calendar month.
Decision
8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,800 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,800 to take effect on 1 January 2025 as the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 17 January 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Poor Condition Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Inspecting Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on local rental values.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment considering the property's accessibility.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination reflecting the open market value of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on their financial circumstances.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the market rent for the property at £1,800 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and local rental values to determine the fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the local rental market values were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local rental values when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions and physical inspection of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and grounds for appeal vary.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
