VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Assessment for Supported Accommodation Unit

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a supported accommodation unit. They considered the market conditions and the services provided by the landlord, setting the rent at £364.82 per week starting from April 1, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment considering the market conditions and the services provided.

Topics

rent assessmentsupported accommodationtenancy agreement

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the terms of the existing tenancy and disregards certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for a supported accommodation unit.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for a supported accommodation unit, taking into account the market conditions and the services provided by the landlord. The rent was set at £364.82 per week, effective from 1 April 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/47UC/MNR/2024/0095

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [COMPANY], Shaftesbury St., West Bromwich, [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £364.82 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

3. The amount included for services included in the rent £114.82 Per week

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 10.7.17 5. Length of the term or rental period weekly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Use of Washer / dryer, Dishwasher, Freezer, Fridge, Hob and Cooker.

8. Description of premises One of four rooms in a two storey Victorian semi-detached house in pleasant residential part of Worcester. Shared off-road parking to the front.

[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Date of Decision 10 July 2025

1

Case Reference : BIR/47UC/MNR/2024/0095

Property

: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicants

: [redacted]

Respondent

: [redacted] : Appeal against a Notice proposing a new rent under an

Assured Periodic Tenancy under section 13(4) of the Housing

Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME].D. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS

D. [NAME] and Venue of : N/A. Paper determination. Hearing

Date of Decision : 10 July 2025

____________________________________________________________

REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

1 The rent is determined at £364.82 (Three Hundred and Sixty Four Pounds Eighty Two pence) per week with effect from 1 April 2024.

REASONS

Introduction

2 The tenant, [APPELLANT] [NAME], took occupation of [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE], on 10 July 2017. At the time he moved in, he signed a draft Tenancy Agreement with [COMPANY] but as far as the Tribunal is able to ascertain there has never been a signed completed agreement between the parties or if there is, it has not been provided to the Tribunal despite numerous requests.

3 On 15 February 2024 the landlord served notice of increase under section 13(2) of The Housing Act 1988 proposing a rent increase from £411.08 per month to £453.52 per week from 1 April 2024. The proposed rent included services.

4 On 30 March 2024 the tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine the rent.

5 The Tribunal issued Directions on 2 April 2024.

6 A Tribunal was convened on 16 July 2024 but was unable to determine the rent due to lack of information from the parties. The Tribunal wrote to the parties on several occasions requesting further details of exactly what services were provided, the extent of demise and other relevant information but have only received further copies of the draft tenancy agreement and a list of costs apparently forming part of the agreement, received from the Respondent landlord on 24 March 2025.

7 The Tribunal has therefore considered the information before it and finds as follows.

The Law

8 Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 states:

'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to

which the notice relates;

(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;

(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as

those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'

'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;

(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant

improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the

tenant, if the improvement-

3

(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the

immediate landlord ...

9 The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 1 July 2013.

10 Although the parties have been unable to provide an executed completed Tenancy Agreement, sufficient information has been provided evidenced by the parties' actions to show that the tenant has an Assured Tenancy, even if not expressly granted by written agreement. Accordingly, the Tribunal is able to determine the rent.

11 The charge proposed by the landlord from 1 April 2024 was £453.52 per week, of which £258.51 was rent for the accommodation and the balance represented service charges under various headings:

enhanced housing management services,

sinking fund

landlord's building insurance

health and safety

maintenance and repairs

management overheads

voids on rent

gardening and ground maintenance

window cleaning

white goods

management overheads

council tax

personal fuel

water rates.

Facts Found

12 The Tribunal has not inspected the property and reached its Decision based on written information provided by the parties and views of the house on Google Streetview.

13 The property is a two storey, semi-detached, Victorian brick and slate house in a pleasant residential part of Worcester. It has a forecourt to the front providing off-road parking for a car which is shared by the tenants. The house has four bedrooms let to tenants needing support. It is understood that each tenant has their own room and shared use of the common parts, kitchen and bathroom.

14 According to the Application, the demise is known as Room 1. It has central heating, carpets and curtains but no double glazing.

15 Neither party requested a Hearing.

Submissions

16 The Applicant's Submission

The Application was made by [NAME] who was appointed Deputy for the Applicant, [NAME], by the Court of Protection.

17 Mr [NAME] main concerns were the level of rent, the level of sinking fund and whether the charges for 'personal fuel' were reasonable. No comparisons were provided.

4

18 The Respondent's Submission

The Respondent sent a copy of the draft 2017 Tenancy Agreement and list of items with pricing in a service charge budget, but no Submission.

Decision

19 The Tribunal has given the parties ample opportunity to clarify exactly what level of services have been provided but it has not been forthcoming. We therefore find the amount under the Act based on the limited information provided.

20 This is supported accommodation and the Tribunal is aware of the demand and limited supply in the area. The landlord's budget itemised rent at £258.51 / week compared with £240.03 / week at 1 April 2023 and bearing in mind that it includes both a bedroom and shared accommodation, we consider it to be at or around a reasonable sum. We determine the rental element at £250.00 / week with effect from 1 April 2024.

21 Further, rents in the private letting market are normally quoted on the basis that tenants pay for their own Council Tax, gas, water and electricity, and with no evidence to show the landlord's costs are unreasonable, we agree the budgeted sums:

Council Tax

£ 4.34

Personal Fuel

£50.95

Water Rates

£ 2.50

22 As this is supported accommodation, we also agree the cost of 'enhanced housing management services' and overheads for providing those services:

enhanced housing management services £25.31

management overheads

£31.72

23 The sums we find as reasonable charges additional to the rent are those listed in paragraphs 19 and 20 above, i.e. £114.82 / week.

24 We find the costs of all other items in the landlord's budget to be normally incurred by commercial landlords and reflected in the rent of furnished accommodation. If not provided, the rental value of the rooms would be less.

25 The weekly rental value of Room 1 is therefore the 'rent' of £250.00 plus £114.82, i.e. £364.82 per week including the services listed in paragraphs 19 and 20 above.

26 In summary, we determine the Market Rent for the purpose of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to be £364.82 (Three Hundred and Sixty Four Pounds Eighty Two Pence) per week with effect from 1 April 2024.

[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS

Chairman

Appeal

In accordance with section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and rule 21 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2010, the Tenant / respondent may make further application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) on a point of law only. Such application must be made in writing and received by the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) no later than 28 days after the date on which the First-tier Tribunal sent notice of this refusal to the

5

party applying for permission to appeal. Where possible, you should send your further application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL], as this will enable the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) to deal with it more efficiently.

Alternatively, the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) may be contacted at: 5th [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (tel: [PHONE]).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the rental element of the accommodation at £250.00 per week, considering it reasonable for a bedroom and shared accommodation.
  • The Tribunal agreed to include costs for "enhanced housing management services" and related overheads because the accommodation is supported housing.
  • The Tribunal was able to determine the rent despite no signed tenancy agreement, as the parties' actions showed an Assured Tenancy existed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for a supported accommodation unit was set at £364.82 per week, effective from April 1, 2024.

Who was involved?

The tenant of a supported accommodation unit and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the market conditions and the services provided by the landlord, ensuring a fair rent assessment.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need for a fair rent assessment considering the market conditions and the services provided.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent based on the services provided and market conditions.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair rent assessment based on market conditions and the services provided by the landlord.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the draft tenancy agreement and a list of costs provided by the landlord were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, the tenant or landlord can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent assessments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.