VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new market rent for a property under an assured tenancy. They set the rent at £590 per week, effective from April 7th, 2025, after considering the property's condition and modern amenities.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. There are additional conditions for when the rent can be increased again after the initial increase.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let by a willing landlord under similar terms and conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a property under an assured tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new market rent of £590 per week for a property under an assured tenancy, taking into account the condition of the property and modern fittings. The decision took effect from 7 April 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BE/MNR/2025/0737

Property : 36 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] : None

Date of Objection : 10 March 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 23 September 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £590 per calendar week with effect from 7 April 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 27 January 2025 which proposed a new rent of £560.01 per week in place of the existing rent of £545.29 per week to take effect from 7 April 2025. This being an increase of £14.72 per week, which equates to 2.7% based upon the government set formula.

2. On the 10 March 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. Therefore, this case was considered on the basis of the papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has received a completed statement from the landlord.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the New Cross area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £640 per week.

6. The Tribunal did not receive any submissions from the parties regarding the condition of the property, however, using its own expertise, we consider a deduction of £50 per week should be applied to take into account no white goods provided by the Landlord. This reduces the rental figure to £590 per week. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

Decision

7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £590 per calendar week.

8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £590 per week to take effect on the 7 April 2025. This being the date in the Landlord’s notice.

3

9. It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination.

Chairman: [NAME] [NAME]: 23 September 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BE/MNR/2025/0737

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 36 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr D [NAME]

[COMPANY].

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 590 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 April 2025

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 27 May 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A mid terrace house with 4 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, cloakroom, rear garden.

[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 23 September 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the market rent.
  • A deduction of £50 per week was applied because the landlord did not provide white goods.
  • The new rent takes effect from April 7, 2025, as stated in the landlord's original notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new market rent of £590 per week for a property under an assured tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the evidence provided and their assessment of the property's condition and modern amenities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and the provision of modern amenities were crucial arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a higher rent than initially proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Statements from both parties and expert knowledge of rental values in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice and representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.