First-tier Tribunal Sets New Mobile Home Pitch Fee Based on RPI Increase
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new annual pitch fee for a mobile home based on the Retail Price Index increase. The decision was made without a hearing as all issues could be resolved through submitted documents.
⚖️ Legal holding
The tribunal can determine a new pitch fee annually if there is no agreement between the parties, under the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal allowed the increase in the pitch fee based on the Retail Price Index increase, without any objections.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the new annual pitch fee for a mobile home based on the Retail Price Index increase, as required by the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/00MF/PHI/2020/0001 P:PAPERREMOTE Property : 122 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] [NAME] : Determination of the pitch fee – paragraph 18 of Schedule 1 Mobile Homes Act 1983, as amended (“the Act”) Tribunal Member : [NAME] of Decision : 25 June 2020 DECISION
Decision of the tribunal The tribunal determines that the new pitch fee with effect from 1st January 2020 for the pitch known as 122 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is £1,682.76 per annum. Introduction and background 1. This has been a remote/hearing on the papers which has been consented to/not objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face to face hearing was not held because no one requested the same nor was it practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle of 20 pages, the contents of which I have recorded. The order made is described at the end of the reasons.
2 2. The applicant is the [NAME] and the respondent is the [NAME] of the Park Home address. They have not agreed the new pitch fee effective from 1st January 2020. Consequently, the [NAME] must apply to the Tribunal in order to obtain the increase. There does not appear to be any dispute regarding the effective date of the increase.
3. On 29th October 2019 the Applicant, served a notice proposing a new annual pitch fee of £1,682.76 based on the current pitch fee of £1,643.40 increased by the change in the Retail Price Index over the twelve months from September 2018.
4. The Applicant applied to the Tribunal on 17 March 2020 for a determination of a new pitch fee.
5. Directions were issued on 20 April 2020 stating that the Tribunal would be content to deal with the [NAME] on the papers only unless any party requested a hearing by 1 June. No such request was received. The Law 6. The [NAME] can only increase the pitch fee annually with the agreement of the [NAME] or, in the absence of an agreement, by a determination of a new pitch fee by the Tribunal.
7. The [NAME] must give written notice accompanied by a prescribed Pitch Fee Review Form. The Tribunal notes that the correct from and time limits have been complied with in this case.
8. Paragraph 18 (1) states that When determining the amount of the new pitch fee particular regard shall be had to—
any sums expended by the owner since the last review date on
improvements— (i) which are for the benefit of the occupiers of mobile homes on the protected [NAME]; (ii) which were the subject of consultation in accordance with paragraph 22(e) and (f) below; and (iii) to which a majority of the occupiers have not disagreed in writing or which, in the case of such disagreement, the court, on the [NAME] of the owner, has ordered should
3 be taken into account when determining the amount of the new pitch fee; Further by S20 (1) There is a presumption that the pitch fee shall increase or decrease by a percentage which is no more than any percentage increase or decrease in the retail prices index since the last review date, unless this would be unreasonable having regard to paragraph 18(1) above.
[NAME]
9. Neither party requested an inspection and the tribunal did not consider that one was necessary, nor would it have been proportionate to the issues in dispute.
The Evidence
10. The applicant provided a bundle of documents containing a copy of the [NAME], the Directions, the pitch fee review letter, Pitch Fee Review Form and an extract from the [NAME] ([NAME]) for the relevant period.
11. The Respondent did not provide any evidence or comments on the proposed review.
Determination
12. As the Tribunal has received no evidence from the Respondent and the increase is based on the increase in the [NAME] it determines that the pitch fee should increase from the review date of 1st January 2020 to £1,682.76 in accordance with the Notice dated 29th October 2019.
13. If the Respondent has continued to pay the original pitch fee since the review date, he must pay the difference to the Applicant. [APPELLANT] 25 June 2020
4 RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Mobile Home Pitch Fee
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Pitch Fee for Mobile Home Park
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Pitch Fee for Mobile Home Based on RPI Increas…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Monthly Pitch Fee for Mobile Home
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Monthly Pitch Fee for Mobile Home
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Mobile Home Pitch Fee
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Pitch Fee Based on RPI Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Mobile Home Pitch Fee Considering Reduced Site Amenities
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Site Owner Granted Annual Pitch Fee Increase Based on RPI
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The site owner is allowed to increase the pitch fee annually based on the Retail Price Index increase, unless it would be unreasonable.
- The site owner can adjust the pitch fee annually but must consider the impact on amenity.
- The site owner may increase the pitch fee annually if the occupier agrees or if the Tribunal determines it reasonable.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The site owner cannot increase the pitch fee if there has been a deterioration in the site's condition and amenities.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new annual pitch fee for a mobile home based on the Retail Price Index increase.
Who was involved?
The site owner and the occupier of a mobile home were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Retail Price Index increase because there was no dispute regarding the effective date of the increase.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Mobile Homes Act 1983 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the pitch fee increase based on the Retail Price Index.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the site owner.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they follow the proper procedures for increasing the pitch fee, including providing the required notice and forms.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the application, directions, pitch fee review letter, and an extract from the Retail Price Index.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a party may appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving mobile home pitch fees.
