VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Monthly Pitch Fee for Mobile Home

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new monthly pitch fee for a mobile home based on the Retail Price Index increase. The decision was made without a hearing as all issues could be resolved through submitted documents.

⚖️ Legal holding

A site owner may increase the pitch fee annually based on the Retail Price Index increase, unless unreasonable.

Topics

tenancy agreementsmobile home feesRetail Price Index

Provisions

Mobile Homes Act 1983, as amendedRetail Price Index

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal set a new monthly pitch fee based on the Retail Price Index increase.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new monthly pitch fee of £120.89 for a mobile home based on the Retail Price Index increase, resolving a dispute between a site owner and a mobile home occupier.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/12UE/PHI/2022/0012 P:PAPERREMOTE Property : 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : Determination of the pitch fee – paragraph 18 of Schedule 1 Mobile Homes Act 1983, as amended (“the Act”) Tribunal Member : [NAME] of Decision : 23 June 2022 DECISION

Decision of the tribunal The tribunal determines that the new pitch fee from 1st January 2022 for the pitch known as 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is £120.89 per month Introduction and background 1. This has been a remote/hearing on the papers which has been consented to/ not objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face to face hearing was not held because no one requested the same nor was it practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was

2 referred to are in a bundle of 47 pages, the contents of which I have recorded. The order made is described at the end of the reasons.

2. The applicant is the site owner and the Respondent is the occupier of the Park Home address. They have not agreed the new pitch fee effective from 1st January 2022. Consequently, the site owner must apply to the Tribunal in order to obtain an increase. There does not appear to be any dispute regarding the effective date of the increase which is contained in the agreement dated 23 May 1984 made between [COMPANY] and [NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT]. The agreement was assigned to the respondent on 5 November 2010.

3. On 18 November 2021 the Applicant, served a notice proposing a new monthly pitch fee of £120.89 based on the current pitch fee of £114.34, increased by the change in the Retail Price Index over the twelve months from October 2020.

4. The Applicant applied to the Tribunal on 9 March 2022 for a determination that a change in the pitch fee is reasonable and the amount of a new pitch fee.

5. Directions were issued on 27 April 2022 stating that the Tribunal would deal with the application on the papers only unless any party requested a hearing by 25 May 2022. No such request was received. The Law 6. The site owner can only increase the pitch fee annually with the agreement of the occupier or, in the absence of an agreement, by a determination of a new pitch fee by the Tribunal.

7. The site owner must give written notice accompanied by a prescribed Pitch Fee Review Form. The Tribunal notes that the correct form and time limits have been complied with in this case.

8. Paragraph 18 (1) states that When determining the amount of the new pitch fee particular regard shall be had to— (a) any sums expended by the owner since the last review date on improvements— (i) which are for the benefit of the occupiers of mobile homes on the protected site;

3 (ii) which were the subject of consultation in accordance with paragraph 22(e) and (f) below; and (iii) to which a majority of the occupiers have not disagreed in writing or which, in the case of such disagreement, the court, on the application of the owner, has ordered should be taken into account when determining the amount of the new pitch fee; Further by S20 (1) There is a presumption that the pitch fee shall increase or decrease by a percentage which is no more than any percentage increase or decrease in the retail prices index since the last review date, unless this would be unreasonable having regard to paragraph 18(1) above.

Site Inspection

9. Neither party requested an inspection and the tribunal did not consider that one was necessary, nor would it have been proportionate to the issues in dispute. The Evidence 10. The applicant provided a bundle of documents containing a copy of the application, the Directions, the original agreement, the pitch fee review letter, Pitch Fee Review Form and an extract from the [NAME] ([NAME]) for the relevant period and a witness statement that the applicant did not know why the Respondent had not agreed to the new pitch fee.

11. The original agreement complies with the terms imposed by the Act as amended.

12. The Respondent did not provide any evidence or comments on the proposed review.

Determination 13. As the Tribunal has received no evidence from the Respondent and the increase is based on the change in the [NAME] over the relevant twelve months it determines that the pitch fee should increase from the review date of 1st January 2022 to £120.89 per month in accordance with the Notice dated 18 November 2021.

14. If the Respondent has continued to pay the original pitch fee since the review date, he must pay the difference to the Applicant. [APPELLANT]

4 23 June 2022

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

3. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The site owner is allowed to increase the pitch fee annually based on the Retail Price Index increase.
  • The increase in pitch fee must not be deemed unreasonable by the court.
  • The site owner must consider the impact on amenity before increasing the pitch fee.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The pitch fee cannot be increased if there has been a deterioration in the site's condition and amenities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal set a new monthly pitch fee of £120.89 for a mobile home based on the Retail Price Index increase.

Who was involved?

A site owner and a mobile home occupier were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Retail Price Index increase, as there was no evidence presented by the occupier to dispute the increase.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Mobile Homes Act 1983, as amended, and the Retail Price Index were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the pitch fee increase based on the Retail Price Index.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the site owner who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with the procedures outlined in the Mobile Homes Act when disputing a pitch fee increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents that mattered included the original agreement, the pitch fee review letter, and the Retail Price Index data.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a party can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over mobile home pitch fees.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.