VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the market conditions and deducted for amenities provided by the tenant, setting the rent at £1,500 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the open market value of the property, adjusted for any tenant-provided amenities.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy and adjusts for any improvements or disrepair caused by the tenant.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the landlord to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes. It also includes maintaining installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, as well as installations for space heating and heating water. However, the landlord is not required to carry out repairs unless they affect the tenant's enjoyment of the property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and adjustments for tenant-provided amenities, setting the rent at £1,500 per calendar month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BE/MNR/2020/0089

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

[COMPANY] 30 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Miss M [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2020

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 26th September 2013

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 – Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises 2 bedroom ground floor flat with central heating and double glazing

[NAME] of Decision 19th October 2020

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

: LON/00BE/MNR/2020/0089

HMCTS Code

: P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord

: [COMPANY]

Tenants

: Mr [NAME] & Miss [NAME] of Application: Determination of a market rent under The Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Tribunal Member : [NAME] of Decision : 19 October 2020

_______________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF REASONS

____________________________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020

2

Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing: This has been a remote hearing on the papers. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. Both parties did not object to the Tribunal making their decision on the papers sent in and without a hearing or an inspection.

Background

1. This is an application dated 20 March 2020 to the First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber by the Tenants of the above property Mr [NAME] & Miss [NAME] under section 13(4) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”), referring a notice served on him by the [COMPANY], proposing a new rent of £1,560.00 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £1,410.00 per calendar month.

2. The Landlord’s notice was dated 10 February 2020 and the date inserted in the notice for the commencement of the new rent was 1 April 2020.

3. The tenancy under which Mr [NAME] & Miss [NAME] occupy the property is a periodic tenancy which commenced on 26 September 2013.

The Property

4. [ADDRESS] is a ground floor two bedroom flat situated withing a purpose built block of flats.

5. The accommodation comprises living room, kitchen, two bedrooms and a bathroom.

6. The property has central heating and double glazing.

7. The landlord has provided a cooker and a fridge/freezer.

8. It is understood that the tenants have provide a washing machine and carpets and curtains.

9. The property is unfurnished.

10. Externally there is shared off-street parking.

Tenant’s improvements

11. The Tenants have carried out no improvements.

3

Landlord’s written representations

12. The Landlord’s representations, dated 2 September 2020, stated that there had been issues with the heating and the supply of hot water and these had now been resolved.

13. Details of six flats within the immediate vicinity of [ADDRESS] were provided. All the flats were marketed in the period 17 March and 18 May 2020 and the asking prices ranged between £1,898 and £2,000 per calendar month.

14. Sun Passage Bermondsey – asking rent £1,898. Two bedroom apartment with balcony.

15. Prospect House, Sun Passage – rent agreed with asking rent of £1,900. Two bedroom apartment with two bathrooms.

16. Pullman Building, Rotherhithe – asking rent £1,907. Two bedroom apartment with balcony, dressing area and parking.

17. [ADDRESS], Bermondsey – rent agreed with asking rent of £1,975.

18. [ADDRESS], Bermondsey – asking rent £1998. Two bedroom apartment with two bathrooms, balcony and bike storage.

19. Sun Passage, Bermondsey – asking rent £2,000. Two bedroom apartment with two bathrooms and balcony.

Tenant’s written representations

20. The Tenants sent in details of their property and stated that there was a leak in the toilet ceiling.

The Law

21. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy.

22. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1) ignored the effect on the rental value of any relevant Tenant’s improvements as defined in section 14 (2) of that Act.

The Decision

22.The Tribunal’s decision was sent to both parties.

4

23. By email dated 27 October the tenants asked for clarification as to the rent stated being 80% of market rent. They also asked for detailed reasons for the Tribunal’s decision.

Reasons for the Decision

24. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the Landlord, and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels.

25. The Tribunal noted that the comparable evidence provided by the Landlord referred to blocks of private housing where it was not uncommon for two bedroom apartments to have two bathrooms and a balcony. In some cases, there were communal gardens and parking. All the properties appeared to be on the market furnished with carpets and curtains.

26. The Tribunal concluded that such a likely market rent would be £1,550.00 per calendar month to reflect the lack of second bathroom, furniture and other amenities provide in the comparable evidence.

27. The Tribunal considered a further deduction of £50 per calendar month in respect of the carpets, curtains and washing machine which were provided by the Tenants.

28. The Tribunal therefore concluded that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market would be £1,500 per calendar month.

29. This rent will take effect from 1 April 2020 being the date specified in the notice.

30. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), on a point of law only. Any such application must be made to the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days of this decision (Rule 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.

[NAME]

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the open market rent by considering the landlord's evidence and its own knowledge of market rent levels.
  • The Tribunal reduced the market rent to account for the property lacking a second bathroom, furniture, and other amenities found in comparable properties.
  • A further deduction was made for carpets, curtains, and a washing machine provided by the tenants.
  • The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £1,500 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a landlord and tenants in a dispute over rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on market conditions and adjusted for amenities provided by the tenants.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's market value with similar properties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenants, as the rent was set lower than the landlord proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider market conditions and any improvements they've made when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of market conditions and comparable rents for similar properties was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law only.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for assistance with such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.