VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £2600 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. This judgment outlines the monthly rent and service charges applicable under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, considering the property's condition and amenities.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2600, effective from May 15, 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, determining the monthly rent and service charges under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00BK/MNR/2023/0225

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 2600.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 May 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 April 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord, except for damage caused by tenant.

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord White goods.

9. Description of premises 2 bed flat on 4th floor of larger period building consisting of basement, ground and 6 upper floors with lift.

Accommodation includes a living room, fitted kitchen, bathroom, 2 bedrooms (one of which with storage/dressing area) and other ancillary storage. The property is generally in a good, modern condition and benefits from central heating and double glazing

Chairman Mr O Dowty MRICS Date of Decision 10 August 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant was entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The rent was determined to be £2600.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent amount took effect on 15 May 2023.
  • The landlord is liable for repairs, except for damage caused by the tenant.
  • The property is a 2-bedroom flat in good, modern condition with central heating and double glazing.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2600, effective from May 15, 2023.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £2600 per month based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.