VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy under Housing Act 1988

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2,600, excluding water rates and council tax, but including other specified amounts. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy, excluding rent increases due to improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £2,600 excluding certain taxes and service charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2022/0186

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

[ADDRESS] Ltd Address C/o [APPELLANT], 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME], [NAME] & [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 2,600 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10th November 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 10th June 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenancy Agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished.

9. Description of premises Purpose built, modern ground floor flat consisting of 2 bedrooms, entry area, utility room, 2 bathrooms (1 of which en suite) and mixed living, kitchen and dining area with external patio area.

Chairman Mr O [NAME] of Decision 30th January 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.
  • The request for a rent register is clearly stated and aligned with the Housing Act 1988 requirements.
  • The court consistently rules in favor of tenants requesting rent registers under the specified conditions.
  • The Housing Act 1988 explicitly grants entitlement to a rent register for tenants under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The claimant's request for a rent register is straightforward and does not include any additional or conflicting claims.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No significant factors leading to a decision against the claimant are present in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2,600.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, determining the rent amount and effective date.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation of the rent amount under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.