VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1,600, starting from February 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1,600 per month, effective from February 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00BK/MNR/2023/0027

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 44 Praha 7 17000 Czech Republic

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,600 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 February 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 April 2019

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord The property was originally let fully furnished, but the tenant has replaced some furniture with permission from the landlord. 1 table, 2 chairs and 1 mirror that the landlord provided remain at the property.

8. Description of premises 1 bed flat with bathroom, hallway, storage area, living room, small kitchen area and balcony on first floor of larger period building.

[NAME] of Decision 21 August 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.
  • The request for a register of rents aligns with the provisions of the Housing Act 1988.
  • Courts consistently rule in favor of tenants requesting a register of rents under the specified conditions.
  • The Housing Act 1988 explicitly grants tenants the right to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • All similar cases have been allowed except for one case marked as "Other".

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • One similar case was marked as "Other", indicating a deviation from the standard ruling.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1,600 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which requires a register of rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the lawful determination of rent under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for determining rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for legal representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.