First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent and Service Charges for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £196 and included a service charge of £3.92 per week, effective from 2 October 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent and service charges determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match the original, except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision was made on 24 February 2025, setting the weekly rent at £196 and including a service charge of £3.92 per week.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/OOBT/MNR/2023/0342
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises
The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [COMPANY] 249, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £196 Per Week (50 weeks per year) (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 2-Oct-23
3. The amount included for services is £3.92 Per Week (50 weeks per year)
4. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 9-Jun-08
5. Rental period Weekly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A
8. Description of premises Ground & 1st flr Maisonette Kitchen, Living Room, 2 Bedrooms, [ADDRESS], Driveway to front
Chairman S [NAME] of Decision 24 February 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent and Service Charges Determined for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant disputes the landlord's proposed rent increase under an assured periodic tenancy agreement.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for determining rent and service charges.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically Section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument centered around the lawful determination of rent and service charges under the Housing Act 1988.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent and service charges to be determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.