First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £400 Monthly for Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £400 per month for a a person that needed updates and repairs. The decision was based on the a person's condition and location, following the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the Housing Act 1988, the tribunal must determine the rent based on what a willing landlord could expect in the open market.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a rent of £400.00 per month after considering the condition and modernity of the premises.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a rent of £400.00 per month for a property in a residential area near the sea front. The property, a second-floor flat in a semi-detached house, required modernisation and maintenance. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])
Case Reference : CAM/42UH/MNR/2019/0022
[NAME] : Flat 3, 26, Lyndhurst road, Lowestoft, [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [APPELLANT]
Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] of [NAME] : to determine a rent under the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] Member
Date of inspection : 12 December 2019
Date Decision Effective: 1 Novemer 2019 _______________________________________________
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF REASONS ____________________________________
DECISION The Tribunal determined a rent of £400.00 per month
THE PREMISES: The [NAME] is a second floor converted flat in a semi-detached house, approximately 100 years old, constructed of brick, partially rendered, with a concrete tile roof. Communal front and rear gardens. Parking on street. Entry via front door, with entry buzzer, to communal hall, and 2 flights of stairs – the second of which is narrow with limited headroom in places - to front door of [NAME]. Communal areas cleaned by residents. Accommodation: 2 double bedrooms, bathroom/WC (no shower), kitchen/diner and living room. Gas central heating/hot water. Only 1 double-glazed window, in bathroom. Landlord has provided carpets, but these are old and in poor condition, and lino in kitchen, which is dated and coming up in places. No furniture, curtains or white goods provided, except basic gas cooker.
CONDITION: External: external decoration poor, and joinery, especially windows, showing signs of decay Internal: Tenant said single-glazed windows draughty, especially in living room. One of bedroom windows cracked. Signs of condensation/mould on inside of a number of the windows. Kitchen and bathroom fittings dated.
TENANT’S IMPROVEMENTS: None of significance in determining rent.
LOCATION In residential area close to the sea front, approximately 1 mile from the town centre.
THE LAW APPLIED: Section 14 Housing Act 1988
TRINUNAL’s CALCULATION Open market rent for [NAME] in good condition £450.00 pm Deduction for lack of modern facilities, and condition £ 50.00 pm £400.00 pm
DECISION: The Tribunal therefore determined a rent of £400.00 per month for the [NAME].
Judge Lancaster
Important Note: This is a summary of the Tribunal’s reasons for its decision. Should you require more detailed reasons, they can be supplied but only if a written request for such reasons is received by the Panel Office within 21 days from the receipt of this document. The papers will then be returned to the Chair for such detailed reasons to be prepared.
Caution: For the purpose of reaching a decision the Tribunal inspected the subject [NAME]. Such inspection is not a structural survey and only takes a few minutes. Any comments about the condition of the [NAME] in this Statement of Reasons are made as a result of casual observation rather than a detailed inspection. Please do not rely upon such comments as a guide to the structural condition of the [NAME].
FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])
Case Reference : CAM/42UH/MNR/2019/0022
[NAME] : Flat 3, 26, Lyndhurst road, Lowestoft, [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [APPELLANT]
Tribunal Members : [NAME] Member
Date of inspection : 12 December 2019
Date Decision Effective: 1 November 2019 _______________________________________________
THE PREMISES: 1.The [NAME] is a second floor converted flat in a semi-detached house, located in a residential area close to the sea front, approximately a mile from the town centre. The house is approximately 100 years old, constructed of brick, partially rendered, with a concrete tile roof. There are communal front and rear gardens. Parking is on the street. The front door to the house has an entry buzzer leading to a communal hall, and 2 flights of stairs – the second of which is narrow with limited headroom in places - to front door of [NAME]. Communal areas are cleaned by the residents.
2. The accommodation consists of 2 double bedrooms, a bathroom/WC (no shower) a kitchen/diner and a living room. There is gas central heating/hot water. The windows are single-glazed apart from 1 double-glazed window, in the bathroom. The Landlord has provided carpets, but these are old and in poor condition, and lino in kitchen, which is dated and coming up in places. The Landlord has not provided furniture, curtains or white goods, except for a basic, dated, gas cooker.
3. The external decoration is poor, and the joinery is in poor condition, with obvious signs for of decay and deterioration, especially the windows. There is a cracked window in one of the bedrooms. There are signs of condensation/mould on the inside of a number of the windows. The kitchen and bathroom fittings are dated. The Tenant has not carried out any improvements of significance to a determination of the rent.
THE TENANCY 4. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of a tenancy agreement, dated 9 July 2018, between [APPELLANT], as Landlord, and the Tenant, and a copy of a letter from [APPELLANT], dated 28 July 2019, informing the Tenant that the [NAME] had been sold to [APPELLANT]. Under the tenancy agreement the Landlord undertakes to keep in repair the structure of the [NAME], including the roof, walls, foundations, timber and stairs.
THE [NAME] 5. By a notice pursuant to section 13 of the Housing Act 1988, dated 14/08/19, the Landlord gave the Tenant notice of their intention to increase the rent from £380.00 per month to £455.00 per month from 1/11/19. By an [NAME] dated 04/10/19 the Tenant referred this notice to the Tribunal.
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PARTIES 6. Representations can either be made either at a hearing, or in writing. Neither party requested a hearing, nor submitted written representations to the Tribunal. However, a copy of a letter from the Landlord to the Tenant was sent to the Tribunal, in which the Landlord stated that the decision to raise the rent had been taken because of a rising housing market in Waveney and an increasing demand for private renting. The Landlord also stated that the proposed rent increase was in line with East Suffolk Council local housing allowance rates for 2-bedroom properties.
THE
DECISION 7. Under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal must determine the rent at which the Tribunal considers that the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy which; - is a periodic tenancy and has the same periods as the Tenancy of the [NAME]; - begins on 01/11/19; - has terms which are the same as those of the Tenancy of the [NAME]. The Tribunal must disregard any improvements made by the Tenant which the Tenant was not obliged to do under the terms of the Tenancy Agreement, and any reduction in value of the [NAME] resulting from any failure by the Tenant to comply with the terms of the Tenancy Agreement.
8. The Tribunals determination is made by first assessing the open market rent for a similar [NAME], in good condition, with modern facilities, carpets, curtains and white goods. Deductions are then made where appropriate.
9. Neither party submitted any rents for comparable properties for the Tribunal’s consideration – the Landlord’s stated view that there is a rising housing market in the area, and rising demand, was not supported by any evidence. Local housing allowance rates are not directly relevant because, to assess a market rent for a particular [NAME], factors such as the location, size, accommodation, lay-out and condition of that particular [NAME] must be taken into account.
10. The Tribunal therefore used their knowledge and experience of the rental market in this area, and determined an open market rent of £450.00 per month for a similar [NAME] in good condition with modern facilities, carpets, curtains and some white goods.
11. The Tribunal then made a deduction for condition of the [NAME], and for the lack of modern facilities, as set out above. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would have to be reduced to attract a tenant. A deduction of £50.00 pm was made to reflect these items, this deduction being the Tribunal’s assessment of the amount by which the rent would have to be reduced to attract a tenant.
14. The Tribunal therefore determined a rent of £400.00 per month for the [NAME].
............................................ Judge Lancaster 27 January 2020
Caution: For the purpose of reaching a decision the Tribunal inspected the subject [NAME]. Such inspection is not a structural survey and only takes a few minutes. Any comments about the condition of the properties in this Statement of Reasons are made as a result of casual observation rather than a detailed inspection. Please do not rely upon such comments as a guide to the structural condition of the properties.
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
5
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and Amenities
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenanted Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition and Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenant Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant made improvements to the property.
- The condition of the property was considered in determining the fair rent.
- The amenities provided by the tenant were taken into account.
- Fair rent adjustments were made based on the property's condition.
- Other relevant factors besides the property's condition were considered.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a monthly rent of £400 for a property in need of modernisation and maintenance.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and amenities, reducing the proposed rent due to the property's outdated features.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the fair rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and amenities of the property were crucial in determining the fair rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also have their rent adjusted based on the condition and amenities of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and the proposed rent increase notice were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
