VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1300 per month, starting from October 17, 2022. This decision ensures a fair rent for the tenant according to the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match the original one, except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting a fair rent of £1300 per calendar month, effective from 17 October 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/36UH/MNR/2022/0172

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 Glebe Garth, Barlby, Selby, [POSTCODE]

Mrs K Southby Ms [RESPONDENT]

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £1300.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 October 2022

3. The amount included for services is: not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 April 2014

5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Month

6. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Modern detached home situated on a small and attractive cul de sac in village of Barlby near Selby

Judge Mrs K Southby Date of Decision 17 March 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the fair rent for the property to be 1300.00 pounds per calendar month.
  • The tribunal's decision on the rent took effect on October 17, 2022.
  • The property is a modern detached home located in a small and attractive cul-de-sac.
  • The landlord is responsible for repairs to the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1300 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 to ensure a fair rent for the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring a fair rent for the tenant was the central argument.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the property details were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.