VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. The tribunal set the monthly rent at £1,650, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in paragraph 3 of the decision.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to set a rent amount for an assured periodic tenancy in accordance with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide on the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The decision takes into account the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match those of the existing one, except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent amount and terms for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £1,650 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AN/MNR/2023/0248

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 67 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1,650 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 2 June 2023

3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 2 January 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None notified.

8. Description of premises 1 bed flat on ground floor of 2 storey period conversion.

[NAME] of Decision 21 August 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed and set by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination based on the condition and location of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 if they dispute it with their landlord.
  • A landlord is entitled to set a rent amount for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, provided it complies with statutory requirements.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in determining the rent amount for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal decided based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, which allows landlords to set rent amounts for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied in determining the rent amount.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The application of Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to set a fair and reasonable rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision is neutral, setting the rent amount as per legal requirements.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

No specific evidence or documents are mentioned as critical in the judgment.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can typically be appealed to the Upper Tribunal, but it depends on the specifics of each case.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for specific legal issues and cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.