VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £775/month rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The tenant requested a determination of their rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, which was granted by setting it at £775 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, for an assured periodic tenancy, as seen in this case involving a semi-detached bungalow in Newcastle upon Tyne.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then set the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £775 per month, effective from May 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting it at £775 per calendar month excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in paragraph 3.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2023/0127

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Dinnington, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] C/O [APPELLANT] [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £775.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 May 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 August 2018

5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs s11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Semi-detached bungalow with one reception room, kitchen, 2 bedrooms, bathroom and rear lean to sun room/greenhouse. It has a front and rear garden and an attached single garage

[NAME] of Decision 18 July 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £775.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision regarding the rent determination took effect on May 1, 2023.
  • The tenancy for the premises commenced on August 1, 2018.
  • The property is described as a semi-detached bungalow with specific rooms and features.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £775 per month, effective from May 2023.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the rent amount for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £775 per month based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting the rent at £775 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.