First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The tenant requested a determination of their rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, which was granted by setting it at £775 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined by the First-tier Tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then set the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
Tribunal sets rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting it at £775 per calendar month excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in paragraph 3.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2023/0127
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Dinnington, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] C/O [APPELLANT] [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £775.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 May 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 August 2018
5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs s11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Semi-detached bungalow with one reception room, kitchen, 2 bedrooms, bathroom and rear lean to sun room/greenhouse. It has a front and rear garden and an attached single garage
[NAME] of Decision 18 July 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy in Gateshead
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £880 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Valuation Adjusted for Tenant Improvements and Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for HMO Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £775.00 per calendar month.
- The decision regarding the rent determination took effect on May 1, 2023.
- The tenancy for the premises commenced on August 1, 2018.
- The property is described as a semi-detached bungalow with specific rooms and features.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent as requested by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's request for a rent determination under Section 14 was central to the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone with an assured periodic tenancy can seek rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal if necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
No specific evidence is mentioned, but typically such cases involve documentation of the tenancy agreement and relevant financial details.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to higher courts.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.