VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £320, effective from June 29, 2022. This decision was based on the terms of the tenancy agreement and relevant laws.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £320 per month effective June 29, 2022. The decision was made after considering the terms of the tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2022/0099

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Room 5, [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Dr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [ADDRESS], Fenham, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £320.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 June 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 February 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Standard

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Bed, Chair, Cupboard and Wardrobe. Rent Inclusive of essential services e.g. heating and lighting

9. Description of premises Mid-terrace house in rooms on ground, first and attic floors built around 1900. Shared Living Room, Kitchen, Bathroom. Rear Yard, Small front garden.

[NAME] of Decision 1 September 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £320.00 per calendar month.
  • The rent includes essential services like heating and lighting.
  • The property is a mid-terrace house with shared living room, kitchen, and bathroom.
  • The landlord provides furniture including a bed, chair, cupboard, and wardrobe.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £320 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the terms of the tenancy agreement and relevant laws.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the terms of the tenancy agreement was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should review their tenancy agreement and relevant laws.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.