VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £900

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £900 per month starting from June 2025. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £900 per calendar month, effective from June 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CX/MNR/2025/0764 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 18 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] [NAME] (Judge) [NAME] (Valuer) Landlord [COMPANY], 145 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is:£ 900 Per Cal month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 26 June 2025 3. The amount included for services is not applicable Not applicable Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 26 June 2024 5. Length of the term or rental period Cal month 6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 s.11 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises Two-bedroom, brick built semi-detached house with rear garden and off-street parking. No tenant or landlord neglect. Chairman [NAME] of Decision 30 June 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed and set by the First-tier Tribunal.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £900 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, ensuring a fair rent determination.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent determination is fair and follows the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.