VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Registers Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent amount and the date when the decision will take effect, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent registration

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent amount and the date the decision takes effect.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CE/MNR/2025/0729 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 51 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tribunal Judge [NAME] Tribunal Member [NAME] [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant 1. The rent is:£ 895.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4th June 2025 3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced April 2023 5. Length of the term or rental period Per calendar month 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy agreement 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord All floor coverings and blinds in the bedrooms and all white goods 8. Description of premises End of terrace property in a block of four properties on a recently built development in Hexthorpe Doncaster comprising 2 bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen/living room and downstairs toilet. There is a small garden to the rear of the property. It has an off-road car parking space at the front of the property. [NAME] of Decision 4th June 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant disputes the landlord's proposed rent increase.
  • The tenant requests a rent determination that reflects the property's condition and market value.
  • The tenant asks for the rent to be set at a reasonable market rate.
  • The tenant seeks a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and necessary improvements.
  • The tenant demands a fair rent based on comparable properties in the area.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent amount and the date the decision would take effect for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent amount and the effective date.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument focused on the application of the Housing Act 1988 to register the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is registered according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant documentation were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It's recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.