VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £650, which includes some services but excludes water rates and council tax. This decision applies from May 28, 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering factors such as the periodic nature of the tenancy and the terms of the existing agreement.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £650 per month, effective from 28 May 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CG/MNR/2025/0728 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Judge A Davies S [COMPANY] 1 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £650 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 May 2025 3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per 4. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 27 May 2021 5. Rental period monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Fridge and cooker 8. Description of premises 3rd floor one bedroomed flat in gated estate. Chairman A Davies Date of Decision 28 May 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £650 per month.
  • The decision on the rent determination takes effect on 28 May 2025.
  • The tenancy is an assured periodic tenancy, with the tribunal making a Section 14 determination.
  • The landlord provides a fridge and cooker as part of the tenancy.
  • The premises are described as a 3rd floor one-bedroom flat in a gated estate.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £650 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent according to the statutory requirements.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the statutory requirements for rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was neutral, applying the statutory requirements.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The statutory requirements under the Housing Act 1988 were the primary basis for the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.