VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Disrepair

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided to reduce the rent from £2383.33 to £1300 per month because of disrepair issues in the property. The decision will take effect on 24th November 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction where there are disrepair issues in the property.

Topics

rent determinationdisrepair

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the terms of the existing tenancy and disregards certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions in value due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a reduced rent due to disrepair issues.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) reduced the rent from £2383.33 to £1300 per month due to disrepair issues in the property. The decision took effect on 24th November 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AW/MNR/2024/0210

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Judge Shepherd Carolyn Barton MRICS

Landlord P and P Holdings Address C/O P Bossi London [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1300 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24th November 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable Nil Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29th April 2017

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per s.11 LTA 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord No

9. Description of premises Flat with 1 bedroom, 1 LR, 1 Bathroom

Chairman Judge Shepherd Date of Decision 11th December 2025

(c)

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AW/MNR/20240210 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : P and [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 13/22 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge Shepherd Caroline Barton FRICS Date and venue of Consideration : 24th [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Summary Reasons : 11th December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1300 per month with effect from 24th November 2025 ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

2 Background 1. On8th February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 2383.33 in place of the existing rent of £1841.67 to take effect from 29th March 2024.

2. On 26th March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 26th March 2024. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the tenant and the landlord.[NAME] has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and/the Landlord. There were no written submissions from the parties. Determination and Valuation

5. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine this application as it was a lawfully valid notice. The current periodic tenancy began on 29th day of the month which is the day the notice expired.

6. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition/its current condition would be in the region of £ 2000 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: Disrepair – 35% 7. The full valuation is shown below:

£2000 per calendar month Market Rent

Less

3 Disrepair List any deductions

35 %

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1300 per calendar month. Decision 9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1300 to take effect on 24th November 2025. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: Judge Shepherd

Date: 11th December 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property has disrepair issues.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the condition of the property.
  • The rent is assessed by the First-tier Tribunal.
  • The tenant's ability to pay is considered in the rent adjustment.
  • Comparable evidence and local rental values are used to determine the fair rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent was reduced from £2383.33 to £1300 per month due to disrepair issues.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to reduce the rent because of disrepair issues in the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the presence of disrepair issues in the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get their rent reduced if there are disrepair issues in their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed, but the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.