VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £865 per month. The decision includes details about service charges and the start date of the statutory periodic assured tenancy.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed and set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 when there is a dispute over the amount.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. However, applications cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent amount and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting a monthly rent of £865 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00ET/MNR/2025/0828 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME], Tribunal Judge [NAME], MRICS, Valuer Member Landlord [NAME] (SE11) [RESPONDENT] c/o [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £865 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15th August 2025 *3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per *4. Service charges are variable and are not included 5. Date statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 14th August 2024 6. Rental period Calendar monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A 9. Description of premises The property is a second floor flat in a purpose-built 4-storey block some 8 years old. The block backs on to the Manchester Ship Canal and the River Mersey in an area of similar flat developments and modern houses. Accommodation Comprises: Second Floor: hallway, store, double bedroom with ensuite shower-room / w.c,. single bedroom, bathroom / w.c., living room / kitchen. [NAME] of Decision 4th September 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed and set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent and service charges set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent and terms of a tenancy agreement determined by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set by a First-tier Tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 if they dispute it with their landlord.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of their rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on the rent amount and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal assessed the property's value and set the rent based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the fair market value of the property and its condition was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It is not specified which party initiated the case, but the rent was set at £865 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone disputing their rent can seek a tribunal assessment under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence on property condition, market value, and service charges was likely important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.