First-tier Tribunal Sets Weekly Rent of £100 for Poor Condition Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a weekly rent of £100 for a property in poor condition, lacking modern amenities, under the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property lacks modern facilities and is in poor condition.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a weekly rent of £100 after considering the property's condition and lack of modern amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a weekly rent of £100 for a property in poor condition, lacking modern amenities, under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference : CAM/00KA/MNR/2018/0037
Property : 24, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [COMPANY] (Nationwide) [APPELLANT]
Tenant : Miss S [APPELLANT] of Application : to determine a rent under the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] Member
Date of inspection : 10 January 2019
Date Decision Effective: 5 January 2019 _______________________________________________
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF REASONS ____________________________________
DECISION The Tribunal determined a rent of £100.00 per week
THE PREMISES: End-terrace period two-storey property, built of local stone, with a single storey, flat-roofed, rear extension, and a timber-framed lean-to conservatory. There is a small front garden, a small rear garden with a brick out-house, used as a store, and what was an allotment is now used as a parking space for up to two cars, though the Tenant said this was not included in the tenancy. The accommodation consists of a sitting room, kitchen/diner, pantry, rear lobby, small bath/WC and lean-to conservatory, with steep stairs from the kitchen to one double and one single bedroom. The Landlord has not provided any furniture, carpets, curtains, or white goods.
CONDITION: External: the front and rear gates and the brick out-house are in very poor condition, as are sections of the fencing. Sections of the rear wall need re-pointing. All windows, doors and fascias are rotten in places, and appear to need substantially replacing – some of the windows are difficult/impossible to open. The Property has not been re-decorated externally for at least 25 years. However, the extension roof has recently been renovated.
Internal: there is no central heating, and there is evidence of significant damp/condensation/mould throughout the property. Hot water is via an immersion heater without a thermostat or timer. The kitchen fittings are very limited, basic and dated, and the bathroom fittings are dated. The Property has not been re-wired for at least 40 years. The water tank, in the second bedroom, is at least 40 years old, made of asbestos, and not properly insulated. The plumbing is dated. The front door is dated and draughty.
TENANT’S IMPROVEMENTS: None of significance to the rent.
LOCATION Located in a sought-after village, close to the A1, approximately 10 miles from Peterborough.
THE LAW APPLIED: Section 14 Housing Act 1988
OPEN MARKET RENT: The Tribunal relied on the Tribunal members’ knowledge and experience, as no comparable evidence was provided by the parties, and determined an open market rent of £650.00 per calendar month for a similar property, in good condition, and with modern facilities, carpets, curtains and some white goods.
TRIBUNAL’S CALCULATIONS
Open Market Rent £650.00 pcm
Less deduction for condition, lack of modern facilities, carpets, curtains and white goods £ 215.00 pcm
Open market rent for subject property £435.00 pcm
DECISION: The Committee therefore determined a rent of £100.00 per week for the subject property.
Judge Lancaster
Important Note: This is a summary of the Tribunal’s reasons for its decision. Should you require more detailed reasons, they can be supplied but only if a written request for such reasons is received by the Panel Office within 21 days from the receipt of this document. The papers will then be returned to the Chair for such detailed reasons to be prepared.
Caution: For the purpose of reaching a decision the Tribunal inspected the subject property. Such inspection is not a structural survey and only takes a few minutes. Any comments about the condition of the property in this Statement of Reasons are made as a result of casual observation rather
than a detailed inspection. Please do not rely upon such comments as a guide to the structural condition of the property.
4
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property's Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent for Poorly Maintained Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal slashes rent to £184.61 per week for assured tenancy in poor condi…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Disrepair and Lack of Amenities
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £1,700/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Croydon
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £1150 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal reduces rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle to £1,380 per month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £1,046/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Leeds
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Condition and Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Disrepair
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property is in poor condition.
- The property lacks modern facilities.
- The property is in a state of disrepair.
- The property lacks essential facilities.
- The tenant has made improvements to the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a weekly rent of £100 for a property in poor condition near Peterborough.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was over the appropriate rent for a property in poor condition near Peterborough.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to set a rent of £100 per week, taking into account the poor condition and lack of modern amenities in the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the lack of modern amenities.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to a reduced rent if their property is in poor condition and lacks modern amenities.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and the lack of modern amenities were the key factors considered by the Tribunal.
