VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Landlord Granted Dispensation for Boiler Installation Without Full Consultation

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord permission to install a temporary and permanent boiler without fully consulting all leaseholders, as the landlord had followed the correct procedures under the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 if certain conditions are met.

Topics

tenancy disputesboiler installationconsultation requirements

Provisions

s.20ZA Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

📖 What the law says

Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to bypass consultation requirements related to certain works or long-term agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for installing a temporary and permanent boiler.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements to the landlord for the installation of a temporary and permanent boiler, finding that the landlord had followed the necessary procedures under the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK.LDC/2019/0123 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]. Applicant : [redacted] Company. Representative : [NAME] Respondent : [redacted] application. Representative : In person Type of application : Application under S.20ZA Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 for dispensation from the requirements to consult in relation to Qualifying Works. Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] Ms. S. Coughlin Date and venue of determination : 16 September 2019 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 16 September 2019

DECISION

2

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion and grant dispensation from the requirements to consult leaseholders in relation to the installation of a temporary boiler and the installation of a permanent boiler in the premises as detailed in the application. The application 1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

2. The application which is dated 24 July 2019 relates to the installation of a temporary boiler, whilst a new boiler is installed in the premises. The applicants seek dispensation from the requirements to consult in relation to both the temporary boiler installation and the installation of the new boiler. The applicants say that they wish to minimise the rental costs of the temporary boiler whilst a new permanent system is installed. A Notice of Estimates under the Consultation Regulations was served on the respondents on 24 July 2019, identifying the works to be undertaken, and providing details of the five estimates obtained.

3. On 15 August 2019, the tribunal issued directions, which required amongst other things for any respondent leaseholder who opposed the application to indicate their opposition on a reply-slip and provide a statement setting out the grounds of opposition.

4. The directions also required the applicant to provide a bundle of documents, including any statements from respondents. A bundle has been supplied to the tribunal and it appears from those documents that there has been no opposition to the application.

5. The tribunal has considered the papers provided and determines that it should exercise its discretion and grant dispensation from any further requirements to consult leaseholders in relation to these works.

6. The parties should be aware however, that the grant of dispensation does not mean that the tribunal is satisfied the works, when complete will be reasonable or the costs of carrying out those works would be either reasonable or payable by the respondents. The respondents’ rights under S.27A of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 to challenge the cost and/or payability of the costs for the works are preserved.

Tribunal: [NAME]: 16 September 2019.

3

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Works are considered urgent.
  • There is no prejudice to leaseholders.
  • The landlord seeks dispensation under section 20ZA.
  • The site owner adjusts the pitch fee in line with CPI.
  • Tenants are entitled to reductions in service charges if costs are unreasonable.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant the landlord dispensation from the requirement to consult leaseholders regarding the installation of a temporary and permanent boiler.

Who was involved?

The landlord and various leaseholders were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant dispensation because the landlord had followed the necessary procedures under the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the landlord had followed the correct procedures under the Act.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if they follow the correct procedures.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the procedures followed by the landlord under the Act mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.